Kathryn Abrams & Hila Keren, Who's Afraid of Law and the Emotions?, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1997  (2010). Abstract

Charles Adelsheim, Functional magnetic resonance detection of deception: great as fundamental research, inadequate as substantive evidence, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 885  (2011). Abstract

Neil K. Aggarwal, Neuroimaging, Culture, and Forensic Psychiatry, 37 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 239  (2009). Abstract

Eyal Aharoni, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Kent A. Kiehl, Can psychopathic offenders discern moral wrongs? A new look at the moral/conventional distinction, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 15 Aug 2011  (2011). Abstract

Eyal Aharoni, Chadd Funk, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Michael Gazzaniga, Can Neurological Evidence Help Courts Assess Criminal Responsibility? Lessons from Law and Neuroscience, 1124 Annals N.Y. Acad. Of Sci. 145  (2008). Abstract

Larry Alexander, Criminal and Moral Responsibility and the Libet Experiments, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Archie A. Alexander, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lie Detection: Is a “Brainstorm” Heading Toward the “Gatekeeper”?, 7 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol'y 1  (2006). Abstract

Stephanie W. Allen, Law Firm Leadership on the Neuro Frontier, 26 No. 2 Of Counsel 10  (2007). Abstract

Anil Ananthaswamy, AI lie detection could help crack terror cells, NewScientist, Mar. 14, 2011,  (2011).  

Steven W. Anderson, Antoine Bechara, Hanna Damasio, Daniel Tranel, Antonio R. Damasio, Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex, 2 Nature 11 (1999)  (1999). Abstract

George J. Annas, Foreword: Imagining a New Era of Neuroimaging, Neuroethics, and Neurolaw , 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 163  (2007).  

Paul S. Appelbaum, The New Lie Detectors: Neuroscience, Deception, and the Courts, 58 Psychiatry Servs. 460  (2007). Abstract

Paul S. Appelbaum, Behavioral Genetics and the Punishment of Crime, 56 Law & Psychiatry 25  (2005).  

Berna Arda, Ahmet Aciduman, Neuroethics and Neurolaw in Turkey, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

David J. Arkush, Situating Emotion: A Critical Realist View of Emotion and Nonconscious Cognitive Processes for Law and Legal Theory, 2008 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1275  (2008). Abstract

Jay D. Aronson, The Law's Use of Brain Evidence, 6 Ann. Rev. L. & Soc. Sci. 93  (2010). Abstract

Jay D. Aronson, Neuroscience and Juvenile Justice, 42 Akron L. Rev. 917  (2009). Abstract

Jay D. Aronson, Brain Imaging, Culpability and the Juvenile Death Penalty, 13 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 115  (2007).  

Bruce A. Arrigo, Punishment, Freedom, and the Culture of Control: The Case of Brain Imaging and the Law, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 457  (2007). Abstract

Elizabeth E. Bader, The Psychology of Mediation: Issues of Self and Identity and the IDR Cycle, 10 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 183  (2010).  

Bernard Baertschi & Alexandre Mauron, Genetic Determinism, Neuronal Determinism, and Determinism Tout Court, Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian, eds., 2011).  

Abigail A. Baird & Jonathan A. Fugelsang, The Emergence of Consequential Thought: Evidence from Neuroscience, Law and the Brain 245 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

K. Michael Baker, Time for Change: Handling Child Prostitution Cases in Georgia, 4 J. Marshall L.J. 177  (2011). Abstract

David Ball, Damages and the Reptilian Brain, 45-SEP Trial 24  (2009).  

Susan A. Bandes, The Promise and Pitfalls of Neuroscience for Criminal Law and Procedure, 8 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 119  (2010). Abstract

Susan A. Bandes, Repellent Crimes and Rational Deliberation: Emotion and the Death Penalty, 33 Vt. L. Rev. 489  (2009). Abstract

William P. Banks & Eve A. Isham, Do We Really Know What We Are Doing? Implications of Reported Time of Decision for Theories of Volition, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Michael Barbee, Juveniles are Different: Juvenile Life Without Parole After Graham v. Florida, 81 Miss. L.J. 299  (2011).  

Jennifer S. Bard, Oh Yes, I Remember it Well': Why the Inherent Unreliability of Technology which Purports to Retrieve Human Memories Makes it Inappropriate for Forensic Use,  (2011). Abstract

Jody C. Barillare, As Its Next Witness, the State Calls . . . the Defendant: Brain Fingerprinting As “Testimonial” Under the Fifth Amendment, 79 Temp. L. Rev. 971  (2006). Abstract

Jayne W. Barnard, Deception, Decisions, and Investor Education, 17 Elder L.J. 201  (2009). Abstract

John A. Barnden & Donald M. Peterson, Artificial Intelligence, Mindreading and Reasoning in Law, 22 Cardozo L. Rev. 1381  (2001). Abstract

Benjamin Barros, Human Behavior, Evolution, and the Law: The Case of the Biology of Possession,  (2010). Abstract

Abram S. Barth, A Double-Edged Sword: The Role of Neuroimaging in Federal Capital Sentencing, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 501  (2007). Abstract

Joseph H. Baskin, Judith G. Edersheim & Bruce H. Price, Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Neuroimaging in the Courtroom, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 239  (2007). Abstract

Shelley Batts, Brain Lesions and Their Implications in Criminal Responsibility, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 261  (2009). Abstract

Don C. Bauermeister, Responding to Juror Bias—Gaining Insight From Cognitive Neuroscience, Winter 2006 ATLA-CLE 89  (2006).  

Erica Beecher-Monas & Edgar Garcia-Rill, Genetic Predictions of Future Dangerousness: Is There a Blueprint for Violence?, 69-SPG Law & Contemp. Probs. 301  (2006). Abstract

Erica Beecher-Monas & Edgar Garcia-Rill, Danger at the Edge Of Chaos: Predicting Violent Behavior in a Post-Daubert World, 24 Cardozo L. Rev. 1845  (2003). Abstract

Erica Beecher-Monas & Edgar Garcia-Rill, The Law and the Brain: Judging Scientific Evidence of Intent, 1 J. App. Prac. & Process 243  (1999). Abstract

Annabelle Belcher & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Neurolaw, 1 Wiley Interdisc. Revs: Cognitive Sci. 18  (2010).  

Jeffrey Bellin, Significance (If Any) for the Federal Criminal Justice System of Advances in Lie Detector Technology, 80 Temp. L. Rev. 711  (2007). Abstract

Donald L. Beschle, Cognitive Dissonance Revisited: Roper v. Simmons and the Issue of Adolescent Decision-Making Competence, 52 Wayne L. Rev. 1  (2006).  

Joseph S. Bird, Cognitive Neuroscience as a Model for Neural Software Patent Examination, 31 AIPLA Q.J. 273  (2003). Abstract

Richard Birke, Neuroscience and negotiation, 17 Disp. Resol. Mag. 4  (2011). Abstract

Richard Birke, Neuroscience and Settlement: An Examination of Scientific Innovations and Practical Applications, 25 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 477  (2010).  

Donald M. Bitz & Jean S. Bitz, Incompetence in the Brain Injured Individual, 12 St. Thomas L. Rev. 205  (1999).  

Robert H. Blank, Brain Policy: How the New Neuroscience Will Change Our Lives and Our Politics, Georgetown Univ. Press  (1999).  

Gary L. Blasi, What Lawyers Know: Lawyering Expertise, Cognitive Science, and the Functions of Theory, 45 J. Legal Educ. 313  (2005). Abstract

Beryl Blaustone, Improving clinical judgment in lawyering with multidisciplinary knowledge about brain function and human behavior: what should law students learn about human behavior for effective lawyering?, 40 U. Balt. L. Rev. 607  (2011). Abstract

Mart Bles & John D. Haynes, Detecting Concealed Information Using Brain-Imaging Technology, Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Hans Markowitsch, ed., 2009). Abstract

Marc J. Blitz, Freedom of Thought for the Extended Mind: Cognitive Enhancement and the Constitution, 2010 Wis. L. Rev. 1049  (2010). Abstract

Kate E. Bloch, Changing the Topography of Sentencing, 7 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 185  (2010).  

Kate E. Bloch, Cognition and Star Trek: Learning and Legal Education, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 959  (2009).  

Floyd E. Bloom, Does Neuroscience Give Us New Insights Into Drug Addiction?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 42 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

John H. Blume, Emily C. Paavola, Life, death, and neuroimaging: the advantages and disadvantages of the defense's use of neuroimages in capital cases-lessons from the front, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 909  (2011). Abstract

Jeremy A. Blumenthal, Emotional Paternalism, 35 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1  (2007). Abstract

Jeremy A. Blumenthal, Law and the Emotions: The Problems of Affective Forecasting, 80 Ind. L.J. 155  (2005). Abstract

Theodore Y. Blumoff, The Brain Sciences and Criminal Law Norms, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 705  (2011). Abstract

Theodore Y. Blumoff, The Neuropsychology of Justifications and Excuses: Some Cases from Self-Defense, Duress, and Provocation, 50 Jurimetrics J. 391  (2010). Abstract

Theodore Y. Blumoff, How (Some) Criminals are Made, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010). Abstract

Theodore Y. Blumoff, The Problems with Blaming, Law, Mind and Brain 127 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009). Abstract

Collin R. Bockman, Cybernetic-Enhancement Technology and the Future of Disability Law, 95 Iowa L. Rev. 1315  (2010). Abstract

Richard G. Boire, Neurocops: The Politics of Prohibition and the Future of Enforcing Social Policy From Inside the Body, 19 J.L. & Health 215  (2004). Abstract

Richard J. Bonnie, The Virtues of Pragmatism in Drug Policy, 13 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 7  (2010).  

Richard J. Bonnie, Responsibility for Addiction, 30 J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 405  (2002). Abstract

Emily Borgelt, Daniel Z. Buchman, Judy Illes, "This is why you've been suffering": reflections of providers on neuroimaging in mental health care, 8 Bioethical Inquiry 15  (2011). Abstract

Cheryl Boudreau, Seana Coulson & Mathew D. McCubbins, Pathways to Persuasion: How Neuroscience Can Inform the Study and Practice of Law, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Cheryl Boudreau, Cues in the Courtroom: When Do They Improve Jurors' Decisions?, Law, Mind and Brain 373 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009).  

Dominique Bourget & Laurie Whitehurst, Amnesia and Crime, 35 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 469  (2007). Abstract

Donald Braman, Dan M. Kahan & David A. Hoffman, Some Realism About Punishment Naturalism, 77 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1531  (2010). Abstract

John D. Briner, Brain Trauma and the Myth of the Resilient Child, 39-MAR Trial 64  (2003). Abstract

Warren Brookbanks, Neuroscience, "Folk Psychology", and the Future of Criminal Responsibility, 2008 N.Z. L. Rev. 623  (2008).  

Teneille R. Brown & Jennifer B. McCormick, New Directions in Neuroscience Policy, Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian, eds., 2011).  

Teneille Brown & Emily Murphy, Through A Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant's Past Mental States, 62 Stan. L. Rev. 1119  (2010). Abstract

Tommaso Bruni, Cross-Cultural Variation and fMRI Lie-Detection, TECHNOLOGIES ON THE STAND: LEGAL AND ETHICAL QUESTIONS IN NEUROSCIENCE AND ROBOTICS (pp. 129-148, B. Van den Berg, L. Klaming, eds., Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers) Abstract

Bethany C. Bryant, Expanding Atkins and Roper: A Diagnostic Approach to Excluding the Death Penalty as Punishment for Schizophrenic Offenders, 78 Miss. L.J. 905  (2009).  

Daniel Z. Buchman & Judy Illes, Imaging Genetics for Our Neurogenetic Future, 11 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 79  (2010). Abstract

Daniel Z. Buchman, Judy Illes & Peter B. Reiner, The Paradox of Addiction Neuroscience, ___ Neuroethics ___  (2010). Abstract

Joshua Buckholtz et al, The Neural Correlates of Third-Party Punishment, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010). Abstract

Joshua W. Buckholtz, Christopher L. Asplund, Paul E. Dux, David H. Zald, John C. Gore, Owen D. Jones & René Marois, The Neural Correlates of Third Party Punishment, 60 Neuron 930  (2008). Abstract

Tom Buller, Brains, Lies, and Psychological Explanations, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 51 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

B Bumann, DM Eagleman, Intuitions of blameworthiness as a heuristic that evaluates the probability of the offender committing future antisocial acts, __Thurgood Marshall Law Journal__  (2011).  

Hillary Burgess, Deepening the Discourse Using the Legal Mind's Eye: Lessons from Neuroscience and Educational Psychology that Optimize Law School Learning, 29 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 1  (2010). Abstract

Alafair S. Burke, Prosecutorial Agnosticism, 8 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 79  (2010).  

Alafair S. Burke, Improving Prosecutorial Decision Making: Some Lessons of Cognitive Science, 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1587  (2006). Abstract

Jeffrey M. Burns, Russell H. Swerdlow, Right Orbitofrontal Tumor With Pedophilia Symptom and Constructional Apraxia Sign, 60 Arch Neurol 437  (2003).  

Angela O. Burton, "They Use it Like Candy": How the Prescription of Psychotropic Drugs to State-Involved Children Violates International Law, 35 Brook. J. Int'l L. 453  (2010). Abstract

Emily Buss, What the Law Should (and Should Not) Learn from Child Development Research, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 13  (2010).  

Emily Buss, Rethinking the Connection Between Developmental Science and Juvenile Justice, 76 U. Chi. L. Rev. 493  (2009).  

Enrique Cáceres, Steps Toward a Constructivist and Coherentist Theory of Judicial Reasoning in Civil Law Tradition, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Craig R. Callen, Cognitive Science and the Sufficiency of "Sufficiency of the Evidence" Tests, 65 Tul. L. Rev. 1113  (1991).  

John S. Callender, Free Will and Responsibility: A Guide for Practitioners, Oxford University Press  (2010). Abstract

Colin F. Camerer, Wanting, Liking, and Learning: Neuroscience and Paternalism, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 87  (2006).  

Turhan Canli, When Genes and Brains Unite: Ethical Implications of Genomic Neuroimaging, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 169 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Turhan Canli, Zenab Amin, Neuroimaging of emotion and personality: scientific evidence and ethical considerations, 50 Brain and Cognition 414  (2002). Abstract

Laura Capraro, The Juridical Rise of Emotions in the Decisional Process of Popular Juries, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

June Carbone, Neuroscience and Ideology: Why Science Can Never Supply a Complete Answer for Adolescent Immaturity, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

June Carbone & Naomi Cahn, Examining the Biological Bases of Family Law: Lessons to be Learned for the Evolutionary Analysis of Law, Law, Mind and Brain 323 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009). Abstract

Francesca Carota, Michel Desmurget & A. Sirigu, Forward Modeling Mediates Motor Awareness, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Melinda Carrido, Revisiting the Insanity Defense: A Case for Resurrecting the Volitional Prong of the Insanity Defense in Light of Neurosceintific Advances, 41 Sw. L. Rev. 309  (2012). Abstract

William Casebeer, Security, stories and the other: the narrative neurobiology of identify formation, Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference: Law, Institutions & Human Behavior, 2011  (2011). Abstract

William D. Casebeer, Reason's Ends: Ecological Rationality and Moral Judgment, 35 Queen's L.J. 359  (2009). Abstract

Stewart M. Casper, Cross-Examination of the Defense Expert in a Traumatic Brain Injury Case—No Perry Mason Moments, 1 Ann. 2008 AAJ-CLE 1103  (2008).  

Melissa S. Caulum, Postadolescent Brain Development: A Disconnect Between Neuroscience, Emerging Adults, and the Corrections System, 2007 Wis. L. Rev. 729  (2007). Abstract

Erik D. Chan, The Food and Drug Administration and the Future of the Brain-Computer Interface: Adapting FDA Device Law to the Challenges of Human-Machine Enhancement, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 117  (2007). Abstract

Jennifer A. Chandler, Autonomy and the Unintended Legal Consequences of Emerging Neurotherapies, ___ Neuroethics ___  (2011). Abstract

Jennifer A. Chandler, Reading the Judicial Mind: Predicting the Courts' Reaction to the Use of Neuroscientific Evidence for Lie Detection, 33 Dalhousie L.J. 85  (2010). Abstract

Luis E. Chiesa, Beyond Torture: The Nemo Tenetur Principle in Borderline Cases, 30 B.C. Third World L.J. 35  (2010). Abstract

Eun-Kyoung Choi et al., Brain Death Revisited: The Case for a National Standard, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 824  (2008). Abstract

Terrence Chorvat & Kevin McCabe, The Brain and the Law, Law and the Brain 113 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

Terrence R. Chorvat & Kevin A. McCabe, Neuroeconomics and Rationality, 80 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1235  (2005). Abstract

Terrence R. Chorvat, Kevin A. McCabe & Vernon L. Smith, Law and Neuroeconomics, 13 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 35  (2005). Abstract

Suparna Choudhury, Saskia Kathi Nagel, Jan Slaby, Critical neuroscience: linking neuroscience and soceity through critical practice, 4 BioSocieties 61  (2009). Abstract

Christopher J. Churchill, The Parity Cure: Solving Unequal Treatment of Mental Illness Health Insurance Through Federal Legislation, 44 Ga. L. Rev. 511  (2010).  

Patricia S. Churchland, Moral Decision-making and the Brain, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 3 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Steven E. Clark & Gary L. Wells, On The Diagnosticity Of Multiple-Witness Identifications, 32 Law & Hum. Behav. 406  (2008). Abstract

Lisa Claydon, Paul Catley, Neuroscientific Evidence in the English Courts, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

L. Claydon, Law, Neuroscience, and Criminal Culpability, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Lisa Claydon, Mind the Gap: Problems of Mind, Body and Brain in the Criminal Law, Law, Mind and Brain 55 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009).  

Jordan T. Cohen, Merchants of Deception: The Deceptive Advertising of FMRI Lie Detection Technology, 35 Seton Hall Legis. J. 158  (2010). Abstract

E. Spencer Compton, Not Guilty by Reason of Neuroimaging: The Need for Cautionary Jury Instructions for Neuroscience Evidence in Criminal Trials, 12 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 333  (2010). Abstract

Robert L. Conason & Steven E. Pegalis, Neurologic Birth Injury, 31 J. Legal Med. 249  (2010).  

Joseph W. Cormier, Providing Those With Mental Illness Full and Fair Treatment: Legislative Considerations in the Post-Clark Era, 47 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 129  (2010).  

Russell Covey, Reconsidering the Relationship Between Cognitive Psychology and Plea Bargaining, 91 Marq. L. Rev. 213  (2007). Abstract

Colin Crawford, Criminal Penalties for Creating a Toxic Environment: Mens Rea, Environmental Criminal Liability Standard and the Neurotoxicity Hypothesis, 27 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 341  (2000). Abstract

Anne C. Dailey, Imagination and Choice, 35 Law & Soc. Inquiry 175  (2010). Abstract

John M. Darley, Citizens' Assignments of Punishment for Moral Transgressions: A Case Study in the Psychology of Punishment, 8 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 101  (2010).  

Robert E. Dauer, Evidentiary Admissibility of Evidence of Neurodiagnostic Testing Showing Frontal Brain Lesion as a Defense in a Criminal Homicide Trial, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 211  (1996).  

John Dawson & George Szmukler, Why Distinguish "Mental" and "Physical" Illness in the Law of Involuntary Treatment?, Law, Mind and Brain 173 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009).  

Rodney J. S. Deaton, Neuroscience and the In Corpore-ted First Amendment, 4 First Amend. L. Rev. 181  (2006).  

Mauricio R. Delgado & James G. Dilmore, Social and Emotional Influences on Decision Making and the Brain, 9 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 899  (2008). Abstract

Deborah W. Denno, Changing Law's Mind: How Neuroscience Can Help Us Punish Criminals More Fairly and Effectively, Oxford University Press (forthcoming)  (2011). Abstract

Deborah W. Denno , Neuroscience, Cognitive Psychology, and the Criminal Justice System: Introduction, 8 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 1  (2010). Abstract

Deborah W. Denno, Consciousness and Culpability in American Criminal Law, 12 Waseda Procs. Comp. L. 115  (2009). Abstract

Deborah W. Denno, Revisiting the Legal Link Between Genetics and Crime, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 209  (2006).  

Deborah W. Denno, Crime and Consciousness: Science and Involuntary Acts, 87 Minn. L. Rev. 269  (2002). Abstract

Deborah W. Denno, Gender, Crime, and the Criminal Law Defenses, 85 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 80  (1994). Abstract

Deborah W. Denno, Human Biology and Criminal Responsibility: Free Will or Free Ride?, 137 U. Pa. L. Rev. 615  (1988). Abstract

Deborah W. Denno, Neuropsychological and Early Environmental Correlates of Sex Differences in Crime, 23 Int'l J. Neuroscience 199  (1984). Abstract

Mark D'Esposito, Leon Deouell, Adam Gazzaley, Alterations in the bold fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging, 4 Nature 1  (2003). Abstract

Robert A. Destro, Learning Neuroscience the Hard Way: The Terri Schiavo Case and the Ethics of Effective Representation, 78 Miss. L.J. 833  (2009).  

Christopher Domin, Mitigating Evidence? The Admissibility of Polygraph Results in the Penalty Phase of a Capital Trial, 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1461  (2009). Abstract

Larry Dossey, Neurolaw or frankenlaw? The thought police have arrived, 6 Explore 5  (2010). Abstract

Rebecca Dresser, Brain Imaging and Courtroom Deception, 40 Hastings Ctr. Rep. 7  (2010). Abstract

Harald Dressing, Alexander Sartorius & Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg, Implications of fMRI and Genetics for the Law and the Routine Practice of Forensic Psychiatry, Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Hans Markowitsch, ed., 2009). Abstract

Jennifer Drobac, A Bee Line in the Wrong Direction: Science, Teenagers, and the Sting to 'The Age of Consent' , 20 Journal of Law & Policy 63  (2012). Abstract

Jennifer A. Drobac, “Developing Capacity”: Adolescent “Consent” at Work, at Law, and in the Sciences of the Mind, 10 U.C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol'y 1  (2006). Abstract

Stacy S. Drury, Michael S. Scheeringa, Keith E. Schmidt & Charles A. Nelson, From Biology to Behavior to the Law: Policy Implication of the Neurobiology of Early Adverse Experiences, 10 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 25  (2010). Abstract

Bart Du Laing, Equality in Exchange Revisited: From an Evolutionary (Genetic and Cultural) Point of View, Law, Mind and Brain 267 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009). Abstract

Kristen G. Roger & Alan DuBois, The Present and Future Impact of Neuroscience Evidence on Criminal Law, 33-APR Champion 18  (2009).  

James D. Duffy, What Hobbes Left Out: The Neuroscience of Comparison and its Implications For a New Commonwealth, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Charles R. Dyer, The Queen of Chula Vista: Stories of Self-Represented Litigants and a Call for Using Cognitive Linguistics to Work With Them, 99 Law Libr. J. 717  (2007). Abstract

David Eagleman, The Brain on Trial, 308 Atlantic Monthly 112  (2011). Abstract

David Eagleman, Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain, Pantheon Books, 2011  (2011).  

David Eagleman, The human brain: turning our minds to the law, The Telegraph (Apr. 5, 2011)  (2011).  

David M. Eagleman, Why Neuroscience Matters For Rational Drug Policy, 11 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 7  (2010).  

David M. Eagleman, Mark A. Correro & Jyotpal Singh, What Neuroscience May Be Able to Tell Us About Criminal Behavior and Rehabilitation, Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference 2009: Law, Behavior & the Brain  (2009). Abstract

David M. Eagleman, Neuroscience and the Law, 45-APR Hous. Law. 36  (2008). Abstract

Jeffrey P. Ebert & Daniel M. Wegner, Bending Time to One's Will, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Jean Macchiaroli Eggen & Eric J. Laury, Toward a Neuroscience Model of Tort Law: How Functional Neuroimaging Will Transform Tort Doctrine, Columbia Science and Technology Law Review  (). Abstract

Cooper Ellenberg, Lie Detection: A Changing of the Guard in the Quest for Truth in Court?, 33 Law & Psychol. Rev. 139  (2009).  

Richard L. Elliott, Neuropsychiatry in the courtroom, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 933  (2011). Abstract

Robert E. Emery, Anger is Not Anger is Not Anger: Different Motivations Behind Anger and Why They Matter for Family Law, 16 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 346  (2009).  

M. Carmela Epright, Coercing Future Freedom: Consent and Capacities for Autonomous Choice, 38 J.L. Med. & Ethics 799  (2010). Abstract

Richard A. Epstein, Behavioral Economics: Human Errors and Market Correction, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 111  (2006). Abstract

Megan J. Erickson, Blaming the Brain, 11 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 27  (2010).  

Steven K. Erickson, The Neuroscience and Psychology of Moral Decision Making and the Law, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 119  (2009).  

Steven K. Erickson & Alan R. Felthous, Daubert's Bipolar Treatment Of Scientific Expert Testimony--From Frye's Polygraph To Farwell's Brain Fingerprinting, 55 Drake L. Rev. 763  (2007).  

John M. Fabian, Forensic Neuropsychological Assessment and Death Penalty Litigation, 33-APR Champion 24  (2009). Abstract

James H. Fallon, Neuroanatomical Background to Understanding the Brain of the Young Psychopath, 3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 341  (2006). Abstract

Martha Farah , Neuroethics: An Introduction with Readings , MIT Press, Martha Farah, ed., 2010  (2010).  

Martha J. Farah, Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical, 9 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 34  (2005). Abstract

Martha J. Farah, Kimberly G. Noble & H. Hurt, Poverty, Privilege and the Developing Brain: Empirical Findings and Ethical Implications, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 277 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Martha J Farah, Paul Root Wolpe, Monitoring and manipulating brain function: new neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications , 34 Hastings Center Report 35  (2004).  

Martha J. Farah, Emerging Ethical Issues in Neuroscience, 5 Nature Neuroscience 1123  (2002). Abstract

Nita Farahany, Incriminating Thoughts, 46 Stanford L. Rev. __  (2011).  

Nita A. Farahany, A Neurological Foundation for Freedom, 2011 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 11  (2011). Abstract

Nita Farahany, Cruel and Unequal Punishments, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 859  (2009). Abstract

Nita Farahany & Hank Greely, Genetics, Neuroscience, and Criminal Responsibility, The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law 183 (Oxford Univ. Press, Nita Farahany, ed., 2009).  

Nita A. Farahany & James E. Coleman, Jr., Genetics and Responsibility: To Know the Criminal From the Crime, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 115  (2006).  

Brian Farrell, Can't Get You Out of My Head:The Human Rights Implications of Using Brain Scans as Criminal Evidence, 4 Interdisc. J. Hum. Rts. L. 101  (2010).  

Megan Faulkner, Rational Jury Assessment of Damages Through Neuroeconomics, 32 Law & Psychol. Rev. 163  (2008). Abstract

Carole A. Federico, Sofia Lombera & Judy Illes, Intersecting Complexities in Neuroimaging and Neuroethics, Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian, eds., 2011).  

Katherine H. Federle & Paul Skendelas, Thinking Like a Child: Legal Implications of Recent Developments in Brain Research for Juvenile Offenders, Law, Mind and Brain 199 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009).  

William Federspiel, 1984 Arrives: Thought(Crime), Technology, and the Constitution, 16 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 865  (2008). Abstract

Neal Feigenson, Brain Imaging and Courtroom Evidence: On the Admissibility and Persuasiveness of fMRI, Law, Mind and Brain 23 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009). Abstract

Neal Feigenson & Richard K. Sherwin, Thinking Beyond the Shown: Implicit Inferences in Evidence and Argument, 6 Law, Probability & Risk 295  (2007). Abstract

Linda C. Fentiman, Rethinking Addiction: Drugs, Deterrence, and the Neuroscience Revolution, 14 U. Pa. J. L. & Soc. Change 233  (2011). Abstract

Lucy C. Ferguson, The Implications of Developmental Cognitive Research on “Evolving Standards of Decency” and the Imposition of the Death Penalty on Juveniles, 54 Am. U. L. Rev. 441  (2004).  

Howard Fields, Can Neuroscience Identify Pain?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 32 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

Joseph J. Fins, Minds Apart: Severe Brain Injury, Citizenship and Civil Rights, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Joseph J. Fins, Nicholas D. Schiff, Kathleen M. Foley, Late recovery from the minimally conscious state: ethical and policy implications, 68 Neurology 304  (2007). Abstract

John Fischer, Indeterminism and Control: An Approach to the Problem of Luck, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Carl E. Fisher & Paul S. Appelbaum, Diagnosing Consciousness: Neuroimaging, Law, and the Vegetative State, 38 J.L. Med. & Ethics 374  (2010). Abstract

Gregory C. Flatt, All in Your Head: A Comprehensive Approach to Somatoform Disorders in Adult Disability Claims, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1397  (2010).  

Paul J. Ford & Jaimie Henderson, Functional Neurosurgical Intervention: Neuroethics in the Operating Room, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 213 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Kenneth R. Foster, Engineering the Mind, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 185 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Adam R. Fox, Trevor H. Kvaran, Reid Griffith Fontaine, Psychopathy and Culpability: How Responsible is the Psychopath for Criminal Wrongdoing?, FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 521  (2011). Abstract

Dov Fox, The Right to Silence as Protecting Mental Control, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Henry F. Fradella, Why Judges Should Admit Expert Testimony on the Unreliability of Eyewitness Testimony, 2 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1  (2007).  

Michael Freeman, ed., Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues, Oxford University Press  (2010). Abstract

Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., Law, Mind and Brain, Ashgate  (2009). Abstract

Edwin S. Fruehwald, Law and Human Behavior: A Study in Behavioral Biology, Neuroscience, and the Law, Vandeplas Publishing  (2011). Abstract

Edwin S. Fruehwald, A Biological Basis of Rights, 19 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 195  (2010). Abstract

Edwin S. Fruehwald, Postmodern Legal Thought and Cognitive Science, 23 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 375  (2010). Abstract

Edwin S. Fruehwald, Reciprocal Altruism as the Basis for Contract, 47 U. Louisville L. Rev. 489  (2009). Abstract

Edwin S. Fruehwald, Behavioral Biology and Constitutional Analysis, 32 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 375  (2008). Abstract

Edwin S. Fruehwald, The Emperor Has No Clothes: Postmodern Legal Thought and Cognitive Science , 23 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 375  (2006). Abstract

Jonathan A. Fugelsang & Kevin N. Dunbar, A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Understanding Causal Reasoning and the Law, Law and the Brain 157 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

Barcs Gabor et al., Investigation of Vehicle Driving Ability in Two Diagnostic Groups of Epileptic Patients With Special Neuropsychological Approach, 16 Med. & L. 277  (1997). Abstract

Brent Garland & Mark S. Frankel, Considering Convergence: A Policy Dialogue About Behavioral Genetics, Neuroscience, and Law, 69-SPG Law & Contemp. Probs. 101  (2006). Abstract

Brent Garland & Paul W. Glimcher, Cognitive Neuroscience and the Law, 16 Neurobiology 130  (2006). Abstract

Brent Garland, Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice, American Assocation for the Advancement of Science & The Dana Foundation, 2004  (2004). Abstract

Lyn M. Gaudet, Brain fingerprinting, scientific evidence, and daubert: a cautionary lesson from india, 51 Jurimetrics J. 293  (2011). Abstract

Michael S. Gazzaniga, Neuroscience in the Courtroom , 304 Scientific American 54  (2011).  

Michael Gazzaniga, Neuroscience and the Correct Level of Explanation for Understanding Mind, 14 Trends in Cognitive Science 291  (2010).  

Michael S. Gazzaniga, What Is Cognitive Neuroscience?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 2 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

Michael S. Gazzaniga, The Law and Neuroscience, 60 Neuron 412  (2008). Abstract

Michael S. Gazzaniga, Facts, Fictions and the Future of Neuroethics, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 141 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Michael S. Gazzaniga & Megan S. Steven, Free Will in the 21st Century: A Discussion of Neuroscience and the Law, Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 51 (Dana Foundation, Brent Garland, ed., 2004).  

Eric K. Gerard, Waiting in the Wings? The Admissibility of Neuroimagery for Lie Detection, 27 Dev. Mental Health L. 1  (2008). Abstract

Don Gewirtzman, Our Founding Feelings: Emotion, Commitment, and Imagination in Constitutional Culture, 43 U. Rich. L. Rev. 623  (2009). Abstract

Walter Glannon, What Neuroscience Can (and cannot) Tell Us About Criminal Responsibility, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Andrea L. Glenn & Adrian Raine, Psychopathy and Instrumental Aggression: Evolutionary, Neurobiological, and Legal Perspectives, 32 Int'l J.L. & Psychiatry 253  (2009). Abstract

Rashmi Goel, Delinquent or Distracted? Attention Deficit Disorder and the Construction of the Juvenile Offender, 27 Law & Ineq. 1  (2009).  

Steven Goldberg, Neuroscience and the Free Exercise of Religion, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010). Abstract

Daniel S. Goldberg, The History of Scientific and Clinical Images in Mid-to-Late 19th Century American Legal Culture: Implications for Contemporary Law and Neuroscience, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Steven Goldberg, MRIs and the Perception of Risk, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 229  (2007). Abstract

Hendrik Gommer, From the 'Is' to the 'Ought': a Biological Theory of Law, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 449  (2010). Abstract

Oliver R. Goodenough, Micaela Tucker, Neuroscience basics for lawyers, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 945  (2011). Abstract

Oliver R. Goodenough , Juveniles and punishment, Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference: Law, Institutions & Human Behavior, 2011  (2011). Abstract

Oliver R. Goodenough & Micaela Tucker, Law and Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 Ann. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 61  (2010). Abstract

Oliver R. Goodenough & Gregory Decker, Why Do Good People Steal Intellectual Property?, Law, Mind and Brain 345 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009). Abstract

Oliver R. Goodenough & Kristin Prehn, A Neuroscientific Approach to Normative Judgment in Law and Justice, Law and the Brain 77 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

Oliver R. Goodenough, Responsibility and Punishment: Whose Mind? A Response, Law and the Brain 259 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

Oliver R. Goodenough & Kristin Prehn, Mapping Cortical Areas Associated With Legal Reasoning and Moral Intuition, 41 Jurimetrics J. 429  (2001). Abstract

Scott T. Grafton, Has Neuroscience Already Appeared in the Courtroom?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 54 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

Lorie M. Graham & Stephen M. McJohn, Cognition, Law, Stories, 10 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 255  (2009). Abstract

Robert P. Granacher, Applications of Functional Neuroimaging to Civil Litigation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 323  (2008). Abstract

Marco Grasso, The ethics of climate change: with a little help from moral cognitive neuroscience, CISEPS Research Paper No. 7/2011  (2011). Abstract

Tashina Graves, Brian Maniscalco & Hakwan Lau, Volition and the Function of Consciousness, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

David Gray, Punishment as Suffering, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1619  (2010). Abstract

Oscar S. Gray, Third Restatement of Torts: Issue Two Articles and Commentary: Commentary, 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1193  (2009). Abstract

Henry T. Greely & Anthony Wagner, Reference Guide on Neuroscience, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (3rd ed.) Federal Judicial Center; National Research Council  

Henry T. Greely, Neuroscience and Criminal Responsibility: Proving "Can't Help Himself" as a Narrow Bar to Liability, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Henry T. Greely, Law and the Revolution in Neuroscience: An Early Look at the Field, 42 Akron L. Rev. 687  (2009).  

Hank Greely, Neuroscience-Based Lie Detection: The Need for Regulation, Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 46 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).  

Hank Greely, Who Knows What Evil Lurks in the Hearts of Men? Behavioral Genomics, Neuroscience, Criminal Law, and the Search for Hidden Knowledge, The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law 161 (Oxford Univ. Press, Nita Farahany, ed., 2009).  

Henry T. Greely, Neuroscience and Criminal Justice: Not Responsibility But Treatment, 56 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1103  (2008).  

Henry T. Greely, Remarks on Human Biological Enhancement, 56 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1139  (2008).  

Henry T. Greely & Judy Illes, Neuroscience-Based Lie Detection: The Urgent Need For Regulation, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 377  (2007). Abstract

Henry T. Greely, Neuroethics and ELSI: Similarities and Differences, 7 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 599  (2006). Abstract

Henry T. Greely, The Social Effects of Advances in Neuroscience: Legal Problems, Legal Perspectives, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 245 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Henry T. Greely, Premarket Approval Regulation for Lie Detection: An Idea Whose Time May Be Coming, 5 Am. J. Bioethics 50  (2005).  

Henry T. Greely, Prediction, Litigation, Privacy, and Property: Some Possible Legal and Social Implications of Advances in Neuroscience, Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 114 (Dana Foundation, Brent Garland, ed., 2004). Abstract

Sally Green, The Admissibility of Expert Witness Testimony Based on Adolescent Brain Imaging Technology in the Prosecution of Juveniles: How Fairness and Neuroscience Overcome the Evidentiary Obstacles to Allow for Application of a Modified Common Law Infancy Defense, 12 N.C. J. L. & Tech. 1  (2010). Abstract

Ron M. Green, From Genome to Brainome: Charting Lessons Learned, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 105 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Joshua D. Greene & Joseph M. Paxton, Patterns Of Neural Activity Associated With Honest And Dishonest Moral Decisions, 106 Proc. Nat’l Acad. Sci. 12506  (2009). Abstract

Joshua Greene & Jonathan Cohen, For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1775  (2004). Abstract

Joshua Greene, From neural 'is' to moral 'ought': what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology?, 4 Nature 247  (2003). Abstract

Anthony G. Greenwald & Linda Hamilton Krieger, Implicit Bias: Scientific Foundations, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 945  (2006). Abstract

M. Frank Greiffenstein, The Neuropsychological Autopsy, 75 Mich. B.J. 424  (1996).  

Betsy J. Grey, Neuroscience and Emotional Harm in Tort Law: Rethinking the American Approach to Freestanding Emotional Distress Claims, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010). Abstract

Betsy J. Grey, Neuroscience, Emotional Harm, and Emotional Distress Tort Claims, 7 Am. J. Bioethics 65  (2007).  

Staci A. Gruber & Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd, Neurobiology and The Law: A Role in Juvenile Justice?, 3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 321  (2006). Abstract

Jessica R. Gurley & David K. Marcus, The Effects of Neuroimaging and Brain Injury on Insanity Defenses, 26 Behav. Sci. & L. 85  (2008). Abstract

Chris Guthrie, Blinking On The Bench: How Judges Decide Cases, 93 Cornell L. Rev. 1  (2007). Abstract

Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski & Andre J. Wistrich, Insights From Cognitive Psychology , 54 J. Legal Educ. 42  (2004).  

Michael D. Guttentag, Is There a Law Instinct?, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev. 269  (2009). Abstract

Thomas L. Hafemeister & Nicole A. Stockey, Last Stand? The Criminal Responsibility of War Veterans Returning from Iraq and Afghanistan with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, 85 Ind. L.J. 87  (2010). Abstract

Jonathan G. Hakun, David Seelig, Kosha Ruparel, James W. Loughead, E. Busch, Ruben C. Gur & Daniel D. Langleben, Exploring the Cognitive Structure of the Concealed Information Test with fMRI, Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Hans Markowitsch, ed., 2009).  

Mark Hallett, Volition: How Physiology Speaks to the Issue of Responsibility, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Christian M. Halliburton, How Privacy Killed Katz: A Tale of Cognitive Freedom and the Property of Personhood as Fourth Amendment Norm, 42 Akron L. Rev. 803  (2009). Abstract

Christian M. Halliburton, Letting Katz Out of the Bag: Cognitive Freedom and Fourth Amendment Fidelity, 59 Hastings L.J. 309  (2007). Abstract

Melissa Hamilton, Reinvigorating actus reus: the case for involuntary actions by veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder, Berkeley J. Crim. L. (forthcoming)  (2011). Abstract

Jeffrey B. Hammond, The Minimally Conscious Person: A Case Study in Dignity and Personhood and the Standard of Review for Withdrawal of Treatment, 55 Wayne L. Rev. 821  (2009).  

Jon D. Hanson & David G. Yosifon, The Situational Character: A Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal, 93 Geo. L.J. 1  (2004). Abstract

Peter C. Harman, "Locked-In" to Their Decisions: Investigating How the States Govern Revocation of Advance Directives and How Three States Make Revocation Impossible for People With Locked-In Syndrome, 3 Hastings Sci. & Tech. L.J. 193  (2011). Abstract

Jeffrey L. Harrison, Happiness, Efficiency, and the Promise of Decisional Equity: From Outcome to Process, 36 Pepp. L. Rev. 935  (2009).  

Johannes Haushofer & Ernst Fehr, You Shouldn’t Have: Your Brain on Others’ Crimes, 60 Neuron 735  (2008). Abstract

John-Dylan Haynes, Beyond Libet: Long-term Prediction of Free Choices from Neuroimaging Signals, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Kevin J. Heller, The Cognitive Psychology of Mens Rea, 99 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 317  (2009). Abstract

Kevin J. Heller, The Cognitive Psychology of Circumstantial Evidence, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 241  (2006). Abstract

Mark Henaghan, Kate Rouch, Neuroscience and the Law in New Zealand, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

David J. Herring, Losing? Losing What? The Law and Dementia, 3 Child & Fam. L.Q.  (2009). Abstract

Jonathan Herring, Kinship Foster Care: Implications of Behavioral Biology Research, 56 Buff. L. Rev. 495  (2008). Abstract

Marianne Johanna Hilf, Karl Stoger, Country Report: Austria, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Claire A. Hill, Rationality in an Unjust World: A Research Agenda, 35 Queen's L.J. 185  (2009). Abstract

Robert A. Hinde, Law and the Sources of Morality, Law and the Brain 37 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

William Hirstein & Katrina Sifferd, The Legal Self: Executive Processes And Legal Theory, 20 Consciousness and Cognition 156  (2010). Abstract

Morris B. Hoffman, Ten legal dissonances, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 989  (2011). Abstract

David A. Hoffman, Mediation, multiple minds, and managing the negotiation within, 16 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 297  (2011). Abstract

Morris B. Hoffman, Evolutionary Jurisprudence: The End of the Naturalistic Fallacy and the Beginning of Natural Reform?, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Morris B. Hoffman, The Neuroeconomic Path of the Law, Law and the Brain 3 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

Mary Holley, It's All In Your Head: Neurotechnological Lie Detection and the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, 28 Dev. Mental Health L. 1  (2009).  

Benjamin Holley, How Reversible Is Methamphetamine-Related Brain Damage?, 82 N.D. L. Rev. 1135  (2006).  

Matthew B. Holloway, One Image, One Thousand Incriminating Words: Images of Brain Activity and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, 27 Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 141  (2008).  

Terry Horgan, The Phenomenology of Agency and the Libet Results, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Leanne Houston, Amy Vierboom, Neuroscience and Law: Australia, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Peter H. Huang, How Do Securities Laws Influence Affect, Happiness, & Trust?, 3 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 257  (2008). Abstract

Peter H. Huang, Moody Investing and the Supreme Court: Rethinking the Materiality of Information and the Reasonableness of Investors, 13 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 99  (2005). Abstract

Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian, eds., Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, Oxford Univ. Press  (2011). Abstract

Judy Illes & Sofia Lombera, Identifiable Neuro Ethics Challenges to the Banking of Neuro Data, 10 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 71  (2009).  

Judy Illes & Vivian Chin, Bridging Philosophical and Practical Implications of Incidental Findings in Brain Research, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 298  (2008). Abstract

Judy Illes, Matthew P. Kirschen, Emmeline Edwards, L.R. Stanford, Peter Bandettini, Mildred K. Cho, Paul J. Ford, Gary H. Glover, Jennifer Kulynych, Ruth Macklin, Daniel B. Michael, Susan M. Wolf, Incidental findings in brain imaging research, 311 Science 783  (2006). Abstract

Judy Illes, ed., Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy, Oxford University Press  (2005). Abstract

Judy Illes, Eric Racine & Matthew P. Kirschen, A Picture is Worth 1000 Words, but Which 1000?, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 149 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Judy Illes, A Fish Story? Brain Maps, Lie Detection, and Personhood, 6 Cerebrum 73  (2004). Abstract

Judy Illes, Matthew P. Kirschen & John D. E. Gabrieli, From Neuroimaging to Neuroethics, 5 Nature Neuroscience 205  (2003).  

Edward J. Imwinkelried, Serendipitous timing: the coincidental emergence of the new brain science and the advent of an epistemological approach to determining the admissibility of expert testimony, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 959  (2011). Abstract

Thomas R. Insel, Philip S. Wang, Rethinking Mental Illness, 303 J. Am. Med. Ass'n 19  (2010). Abstract

Anne-Marie R. Iselin, Jamie DeCoster & Randall T. Salekin, Maturity in Adolescent and Young Adult Offenders, 33 Law & Hum. Behav. 455  (2009). Abstract

W. Jake Jacobs & Lynn Nadel, Neurobiology of Reconstructed Memory, 4 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 1110  (1998). Abstract

M.H. Sam Jacobson, Paying Attention or Fatally Distracted? Concentration, Memory, and Multi-Tasking in a Multi-Media World, 16 J. Legal Writing Inst. 419  (2010).  

Agnieszka Jaworska, Ethical Dilemmas in Neurodegenerative Disease: Respecting the Margins of Agency, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 87 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Lucille A. Jewel, Through a Glass Darkly: Using Brain Science and Visual Rhetoric to Gain a Professional Perspective on Visual Advocacy, 19 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 237  (2010).  

Ari R. Joffe, The Neurological Determination of Death: What Does It Really Mean?, 23 Issues L. & Med. 119  (2007). Abstract

Steven J. Johansen, Was Colonel Sanders a Terrorist? An Essay on the Ethical Limits of Applied Legal Storytelling, 7 J. Ass'n Legal Writing Directors 63  (2010). Abstract

Mark L. Johnson, Guilty or Innocent? Just Take a Look at my Brain - Analyzing the Nexus Between Traumatic Brain Injury and Criminal Responsibility, 37 S.U. L. Rev. 25  (2009). Abstract

Lydia D. Johnson, Mind, Metaphor, Law, 58 Mercer L. Rev. 845  (2007). Abstract

Owen D. Jones & Francis X. Shen, Law and Neuroscience In The United States, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011) Abstract

Owen D. Jones, Erin O'Hara O'Connor, Jeffrey Evans Stake, Economics, Behavioral Biology, and Law, 19 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 103  (2011). Abstract

Owen D. Jones, Intuitions of Punishment, 77 Chicago L. Rev. 1633  (2010). Abstract

Owen D. Jones, Joshua W. Buckholtz, Jeffrey D. Schall & Rene Marois, Brain Imaging for Legal Thinkers: A Guide for the Perplexed, 2009 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 5  (2009). Abstract

Owen D. Jones & Sarah F. Brosnan, Law, Biology, and Property: A New Theory of the Endowment Effect, 49 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1935  (2008). Abstract

Owen D. Jones & Timothy H. Goldsmith, Behavioral Genetics and Crime, in Context, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 81  (2006).  

Owen D. Jones, Law, Evolution, and the Brain: Applications and Open Questions, Law and the Brain 57 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

Owen D. Jones & Robert Kurzban, Law and Behavioral Biology, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 405  (2005). Abstract

Owen D. Jones, Time-shifted Rationality and the Law of Law's Leverage: Behavioral Economics Meets Behavioral Biology, 95 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1141  (2001). Abstract

Jean Jordan, When the Brain Comes to Court, 33 CDAA Prosecutor’s Brief 5  (2011).  

Jean Jordan, The Role of Neuroscience in Lie Detection, 33 CDAA Prosecutor’s Brief 24  (2011).  

Katsunori Kai, Neurolaw in Japan, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Elke Kalbe, Matthais Brand, Alexander Thiel, J. Kessler & Hans J. Markowitsch, Neuropsychological and Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Deficits in a Mother Who Killed Her Children, Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Hans Markowitsch, ed., 2009). Abstract

Jerry Kang, Implicit Bias and the Pushback from the Left, 54 St. Louis U. L.J. 1139  (2010). Abstract

Jerry Kang & Kristin Lane, Seeing Through Colorblindness: Implicit Bias and the Law, 58 UCLA L. Rev. 465  (2010). Abstract

Marhsall B. Kapp, Legal Issues Arising in the Process of Determining Decisional Capacity in Older Persons, ___ J. Long-Term Health Care ___  (2010). Abstract

K. G. Karaktasanis & J. N. Tsanakas, A Critique on the Concept of “Brain Death”, 18 Issues L. & Med. 127  (2002). Abstract

William J. Katt, Roper and the Scientific Amicus, 49 Jurimetrics J. 253  (2009). Abstract

Paul M. Kaufman, Protecting the Objectivity, Fairness, and Integrity of Neuropsychological Evaluations in Litigation, 26 J. Legal Med. 95  (2005). Abstract

Anders Kaye, Powerful Particulars: The Real Reason the Behavioral Sciences Threaten Criminal Responsibility, 37 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 539  (2010).  

D. H. Kaye, Behavioral Genetics Research and Criminal DNA Databases, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 259  (2006).  

David Keane, Survival of the Fairest? Evolution and the Geneticization of Rights, 30 Oxford J. Legal Stud. 467  (2010). Abstract

Charles N.W. Keckler, Cross-Examining the Brain: A Legal Analysis of Neural Imaging for Credibility Impeachment, 57 Hastings L.J. 509  (2006). Abstract

Frank C. Keil, Getting to the Truth, 73 Brook. L. Rev. 1035  (2008). Abstract

Rachael Kelly, Childhood Neglect and Its Effects on Neurodevelopment: Suggestions for Future Law and Policy, 8 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol'y 133  (2007).  

Hila Keren, Considering Affective Consideration, 40 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 165  (2010). Abstract

Laura S. Khoshbin & Shahram Khoshbin, Imaging the Mind, Minding the Image: A Historical Introduction to Brain Imaging and the Law, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 171  (2007). Abstract

Kent A. Kiehl, Morris B. Hoffman, The Criminal Psychopath: History, Neuroscience, Treatment, and Economics, 51 Jurimetrics J. 355  (2011). Abstract

Kent Kiehl, Can Neuroscience Identify Psychopaths?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 47 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

Robert Kinscherff, Proposition: A Personality Disorder May Nullify Responsibility For a Criminal Act, 38 J.L. Med. & Ethics 745  (2010). Abstract

William Kitchin, The Fundamental Right to Be Free of Arbitrary Categorization: The Brain Sciences and the Issue of Sex Classification, 42 Washburn L.J. 257  (2003).  

Leo Kittay, Admissibility of fMRI Lie Detection, 72 Brook. L. Rev. 1351  (2007).  

Laura Klaming, Bert-Jaap Koops, Neuroscientific Evidence and Criminal Responsibility in the Netherlands, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Laura Klaming & Anton H. Vedder, Brushing Up Our Memories: Can We Use Neurotechnologies to Improve Eyewitness Memory?, 1 Law, Innovation & Tech. 203  (2009). Abstract

Dora W. Klein, Unreasonable: Involuntary Medications, Incompetent Criminal Defendants, and the Fourth Amendment, 46 San Diego L. Rev. 161  (2009). Abstract

Robert Klitzman, Clinicians, Patients and the Brain, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 229 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Joshua J. Knabb, et. al., Neuroscience, Moral Reasoning, and the Law, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 219  (2009). Abstract

Adam J. Kolber, The Experiential Future of the Law, 60 Emory L.J. 585  (2011). Abstract

Adam J. Kolber, The Subjective Experience of Punishment, 109 Colum. L. Rev. 182  (2009). Abstract

Adam J. Kolber, Legal Implications of Memory-Dampening, Law, Mind and Brain 215 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009).  

Adam J. Kolber, Pain Detection and the Privacy of Subjective Experience, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 433  (2007). Abstract

Adam J. Kolber, Therapeutic Forgetting: The Legal and Ethical Implications of Memory Dampening, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 1561  (2006). Abstract

Harrison A. Korn, Micha A. Johnson, Marvin M. Chun, Neurolaw: Differential brain activity for Black and White faces predicts damage awards in hypothetical employment discrimination cases, Social Neuroscience 1  (2011). Abstract

Russell Korobkin, Libertarian Welfarism, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 1651  (2009). Abstract

Tonya Kowalski, True North: Navigating for the Transfer of Learning in Legal Education, 34 Seattle U. L. Rev. 51  (2010). Abstract

F. Andrew Kozel, Developing a Neuropsychiatric Functional Brain Imaging Test, Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Hans Markowitsch, ed., 2009). Abstract

Rebecca Krauss, Neuroscience and Institutional Choice in Federal Sentencing Law, 120 Yale L.J. 367  (2010).  

Ronald Kulich, Raymond Maciewicz & Steven J. Scrivani, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) and Expert Testimony, 10 Pain Med. 373  (2009). Abstract

Jennifer Kulynych, The Regulation of MR Neuroimaging Research: Disentangling the Gordian Knot, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 295  (2007).  

Jennifer J. Kulynych, Some Thoughts about the Evaluation of Non-Clinical Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 7 Am. J. Bioethics 57  (2007).  

Jennifer J. Kulynych, Psychiatric Neuroimaging Evidence: A High-Tech Crystal Ball?, 49 Stan. L. Rev. 1249  (1997). Abstract

Jennifer Kulynych, Brain, Mind, and Criminal Behavior: Neuroimages as Scientific Evidence, 36 Jurimetrics J. 235  (1996).  

Cassandra M. Lamb, Behavioral Biology: The Impact of Neuroimaging and Brain Dysfunction on the Sentencing of Sexual Offenders, 35 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 421  (2009).  

Adam Lamparello, Using Cognitive Neuroscience to Provide a Procedure for the Involuntary Commitment of Violent Criminals as a Part of or Following the Duration of their Sentence (Part II of a Two-Part Series) the Model Statute, 11 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol'y 267  (2012). Abstract

Adam Lamparello, Using Cognitive Neuroscience to Predict Future Dangerousness, 42 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 481  (2011). Abstract

Manuel D. Leal, Why There Is Disobedience of Court Orders: Contempt of Court and Neuroeconomics, 26 QLR 1015  (2008).  

Gregory P. Lekovic, Neuroscience and the Law, 69 Surgical Neurology 99  (2008).  

Andrew E. Lelling, Eliminative Materialism, Neuroscience and the Criminal Law, 141 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1471  (1993).  

Alan M. Lerner, Using Our Brains: What Cognitive Science and Social Psychology Teach Us About Teaching Law Students to Make Ethical, Professionally Responsible, Choices, 23 QLR 643  (2004). Abstract

Jeanne M. Leslie, Understanding Addiction, Helping Clients and Colleagues, 69 Ala. Law. 348  (2008).  

Justin D. Levinson, Forgotten Racial Equality: Implicit Bias, Decisionmaking, and Misremembering, 57 Duke L.J. 345  (2007). Abstract

Benjamin Libet, Do We Have Free Will?, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010). Abstract

Theodore I. Lidsky, Jay S. Schneider & Dennis D. Karpf, The Neuropsychologist in Brain Injury Cases, 34-JUL Trial 70  (1998).  

Martin Lijtmaer, The Felony Murder Rule in Illinois: The Injustice of the Proximate Cause Theory Explored via Research in Cognitive Psychology , 98 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 621  (2008). Abstract

David J. Linden, Brain Evolution and Human Cognition: The Accidental Mind, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 17  (2008).  

Elizabeth Locker, Grow Up Georgia . . . It's Time to Treat Our Children as Children, 4 J. Marshall L. J. 85  (2011). Abstract

Nikos K. Logothetis, What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI, 453 Nature 869  (2008). Abstract

Gert-Jan Lokhorst, Mens Rea, Logic, and the Brain, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

J. W. Looney, Neuroscience's New Techniques For Evaluating Future Dangerousness: Are We Returning To Lombroso's Biological Criminality?, 32 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 301  (2010).  

Sana Loue & Beatrice Ioan, Legal and Ethical Issues in Heroin Diagnosis, Treatment, and Research, 28 J. Legal Med. 193  (2007). Abstract

Sana Loue, The Criminalization of the Addictions, 24 J. Legal Med. 281  (2003). Abstract

Darryl Macer, Neurolaw and UNESCO Bioethics Declarations, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

R. MacKenzie & M. Sakel, The Neuroscience of Cruelty as Brain Damage: Legal Framings of Capacity and Ethical Issues in the Neurorehabilitation of Motor Neurone Disease, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Robin Mackenzie, Reframing the Good Death: Enhancing Choice in Dying, Neuroscience, End-of-Life Research and the Potential of Psychedelics in Palliative Care, Law, Mind and Brain 239 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009).  

Scott N. MacMillan & Michael S. Vaughn, Weighing the Evidence: Neuroimagery Evidence of Brain Trauma or Disorder in Courts, 46 No. 3 Crim. L. Bull. ART 5  (2010). Abstract

Matthias Mahlmann, Ethics, Law and the Challenge of Cognitive Science, 8 German L.J. 577  (2007).  

Gregory N. Mandel, Left-Brain Versus Right-Brain: Competing Conceptions of Creativity in Intellectual Property Law, 44 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 283  (2010). Abstract

Hans Markowitsch, ed., Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase, Psychology Press  (2009). Abstract

Hans J. Markowitsch, Neuroscience and Crime, Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Hans Markowitsch, ed., 2009). Abstract

Jonathan H. Marks, Interrogation Using Functional MRI and Cognitive Engrams, 2008 J. Inst. Just. Int'l Stud. 31  (2008).  

Donald H. Marks, Interrogational Neuroimaging In Counterterrorism: A “No-Brainer” or a Human Rights Hazard?, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 483  (2007). Abstract

Terry A. Maroney, The persistent cultural script of judicial dispassion, 99 Cal. L. Rev. 629  (2011). Abstract

Terry A. Maroney, Emotional Regulation and Judicial Behavior, 99 Cal. L. Rev. 1485  (2011). Abstract

Terry Maroney, Adolescent Brain Science and Juvenile Justice, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Terry A. Maroney, Adolescent Brain Science after Graham v. Florida, 86 Notre Dame L. Rev. 765  (2010). Abstract

Terry A. Maroney, The False Promise of Adolescent Brain Science in Juvenile Justice, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev. 89  (2009). Abstract

Terry A. Maroney, Emotional Competence and "Rational Understanding": A Guide for Defense Counsel, 33-APR Champion 36  (2009).  

Terry A. Maroney, Emotional Common Sense as Constitutional Law, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 851  (2009). Abstract

Terry A. Maroney, Emotional Competence, “Rational Understanding,” and the Criminal Defendant, 43 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1375  (2006). Abstract

Daniel A. Martell, Neuroscience and the Law: Philosophical Differences and Practical Constraints, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 123  (2009). Abstract

Daniel A. Martell, Causal Relation Between Brain Damage and Homicide: The Prosecution, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 184  (1996).  

D.A. Martell, Forensic Neuropsychology and the Criminal Law, 16 Law & Hum. Behav. 313  (1992). Abstract

John Martinez, A Cognitive Science Approach to Teaching Property Rights in Body Parts, 42 J. Legal Educ. 290  (1992). Abstract

Helen Mayberg, Does Neuroscience Give Us New Insights Into Criminal Responsibility?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 37 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

Helen S. Mayberg, Medical-Legal Inferences from Functional Neuroimaging Evidence, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 195  (1996).  

D.P. McCabe, A.D. Castel & M.G. Rhodes, The Influence of fMRI Lie Detection Evidence on Juror Decision Making, 29 Behavioral Sciences and the Law 566  (2011). Abstract

C.M.A. McCauliff, Cognition and Consensus in the Natural Law Tradition and in Neuroscience: Jacques Maritain and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 54 Vill. L. Rev. 435  (2009).  

David B. McConnell, The Sevin Made Me Do It: Mental Non-Responsibility and the Neurotoxic Damage Defense, 14 Va. Envtl. L.J. 151  (1994). Abstract

Michael J. McCormack, Applying the Basic Principles of Cognitive Science to the Standard State Zoning Enabling Act, 27 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 519  (2000). Abstract

Brian McCormick, Your Thoughts May Deceive You: The Constitutional Implications of Brain Fingerprinting Technology and How It May Be Used to Secure Our Skies, 30 Law & Psychol. Rev. 171  (2006).  

Barry McDonald, Campaign Finance Regulation and the Marketplace of Emotions, 36 PEPLR 395  (2009). Abstract

Bruce S. McEwen, Effects of stress on the developing brain, Cerebrum 2011  (2011). Abstract

Ellen M McGee, Should There Be A Law? Brain Chips: Ethical and Policy Issues, 24 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 81  (2007). Abstract

Phil McKenna, Can a brain scan prove you're telling the truth?, 193 New Scientist Feb. 10-16, 2007 at 13  (2007). Abstract

Richard S. McLachlan, Medical Conditions & Driving: Legal Requirements & Approach Of Neurologists, 16 Med. & L. 269  (1997). Abstract

Greta A. McMorris, Critical Race Theory, Cognitive Psychology, and the Social Meaning of Race: Why Individualism Will Not Solve Racism, 67 UMKC L. Rev. 695  (1999).  

John B. Meixner, Liar, liar, jury's the trier? The future of neuroscience-based credibility assessment and the court, 106 Northwestern Univ. L.R. 3  (2012). Abstract

Alfred R. Mele, Libet on Free Will: Readiness Potentials, Decisions, and Awareness, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Michael Mello, Ford's Delusions - And Our Own: Executing the Insane, 45 No. 6 Crim. L. Bull. ART 7  (2009).  

James R. Merikangas, Functional MRI Lie Detection, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 499  (2008). Abstract

Reinhard Merkel, G. Boer, J. Fegert, T. Galert, D. Hartmann, B. Nuttin, S. Rosahl, & F. Wuetscher, Intervening in the Brain: Changing Psyche and Society, Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment (29), Springer, Carl Friedrich Gethmann, ed., 2007  (2007). Abstract

Jozsef Meszaros, Achieving Peace of Mind: The Benefits of Neurobiological Evidence for Battered Women Defendants, 23 Yale J.L. & Feminism 117  (2011). Abstract

Carlin Meyer, Brain, Gender, Law: A Cautionary Tale, 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 995  (2009).  

John Mikhail, Emotion, Neuroscience, and Law: A Comment on Darwin and Greene, Emotion Review, forthcoming  (). Abstract

Franklin G. Miller & Joseph Fins, Protecting Human Subjects in Brain Research: A Pragmatic Perspective, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 123 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Richard A. Millstein & Alan I. Leshner, The Science of Addiction: Research and Public Health Perspectives, 3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 151  (1999). Abstract

Alan C. Milstein, Research Malpractice and the Issue of Incidental Findings, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 356  (2008). Abstract

Carl F. Mishler, How Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Will Change the Legal Profession - A View from the United States of America, 9 Eur. J.L. Reform 17  (2007).  

Gregory Mitchell & Philip E. Tetlock, Antidiscrimination Law and the Perils of Mindreading, 67 Ohio St. L.J. 1023  (2006). Abstract

Dean Mobbs, Hakwan C. Lau, Owen D. Jones & Christopher D. Frith, Law, Responsibility and the Brain, Law, Mind and Brain 1 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009).  

Andre A. Moenssens, Brain Fingerprinting - Can It Be Used to Detect the Innocence of Persons Charged With a Crime?, 70 UMKC L. Rev. 891  (2002). Abstract

Gregory K. Moffatt & Savannah L. Smith, Childhood Exposure to Conjugal Violence: Consequences for Behavioral and Neural Development, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 879  (2007). Abstract

Maren Grainger-Monsen & Kim Karetsky, The Mind in the Movies: A Neuroethical Analysis of the Portrayal of the Mind in Popular Media, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 297 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Read Montague, How Is Neuroscience Likely to Impact Law in the Near Future?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 60 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

Michael S. Moore, Responsible Choices, Desert-Based Legal Institutions, and the Challenges of Contemporary Neuroscience, 29 SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY 1  (2011).  

Michael Moore, Intention, Responsibility and the Challenges of Recent Neuroscience, 2010 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. ___  (2010).  

Michael S. Moore, Libet's Challenge(s) to Responsible Agency, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Jonathan D. Moreno, Brain Trust: Neuroscience and National Security in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian, eds., 2011).  

Joelle A. Moreno, The Future of Neuroimaged Lie Detection and the Law, 42 Akron L. Rev. 717  (2009). Abstract

Jane C. Moriarty, Visions of Deception: Neuroimages and the Search for Truth, 42 Akron L. Rev. 739  (2009). Abstract

Jane C. Moriarty, Forward to the Neuroscience, Law & Government Symposium, 42 Akron L. Rev. 681  (2009).  

Jane Campbell Moriarty, Flickering Admissibility: Neuroimaging Evidence in the U.S. Courts, 26 Behav. Sci. & L. 29  (2008). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, Legal Regulation of Addictive Substances and Addiction, Addiction Neuroethics: The Ethics of Addiction Neuroscience Research and Treatment (Adrian Carter, Wayne Hall, Judy Illes, eds., Elsevier)  

Stephen J. Morse, New Therapies, Old Problems, or, a Plea for Neuromodesty, American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 60  (2012). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, An Accurate Diagnosis, but Is There a Cure? An Appreciation of the Role of Science in Law by Robin Feldman, 3 Hastings Sci. & Tech. L.J. 157  (2011).  

Stephen J. Morse, Mental disorder and criminal law, 101 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 885  (2011). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, Avoiding irrational neurolaw exuberance: a plea for neuromodesty, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 837  (2011). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, Gene-Environment Interactions, Criminal Responsibility, and Sentencing, Chapter 11 in Gene-Environment Interactions in Developmental Psychopathology (Kenneth A. Dodge & Michael Rutter, eds. Guildord Press 2011) Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, The Future of Neuroscientific Evidence, Chapter 5 in The Future of Evidence: How Science & Technology Will Change the Practice of Law (Carol Henderson & Jules Epstein, eds. ABA 2011)  

Stephen J. Morse, Genetics and criminal responsibility, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Forthcoming; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-34.  (2011). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, Addiction and Criminal Responsibility, Addiction and Responsibility (edited by George Graham and Jeffrey Poland, MIT Press)  

Stephen Morse, Protecting Liberty and Autonomy: Desert/Disease Jurisprudence, 48 San Diego L. Rev. 1077  (2011). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, Lost in Translation? An Essay on Law and Neuroscience, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Stephen Morse, Actions Speak Louder Than Images, Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 23 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).  

Stephen J. Morse, Addiction, Science, and Criminal Responsibility, The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law 241 (Oxford Univ. Press, Nita Farahany, ed., 2009).  

Stephen J. Morse, Determinism and the Death of Folk Psychology: Two Challenges to Responsibility from Neuroscience, 9 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 1  (2008). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, Vice, Disorder, Conduct and Culpability, 5 Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 47  (2008).  

Stephen J. Morse, Psychopathy and Criminal Responsibility, 1 Neuroethics 205  (2008). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, Criminal Responsibility and the Disappearing Person, 28 Cardozo L. Rev. 2545  (2007). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse & Morris B. Hoffman, The Uneasy Entente Between Legal Insanity and Mens Rea: Beyond Clark v. Arizona, 97 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1071  (2007). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, The Non-Problem of Free Will in Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 25 Behav. Sci. & L. 203  (2007). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal Responsibility: A Diagnostic Note, 3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 397  (2006). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, Addiction, Genetics and Criminal Responsibility, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 165  (2006).  

Stephen J. Morse, Moral and Legal Responsibility and the New Neuroscience, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 33 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Stephen Morse, New Neuroscience, Old Problems, Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 157 (Dana Foundation, Brent Garland, ed., 2004).  

Stephen J. Morse, Inevitable Mens Rea, 27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 51  (2003). Abstract

Stephen J. Morse, Brain and Blame, 84 Geo. L.J. 527  (1996). Abstract

Emily R. Murphy & Henry T. Greely, What Will Be the Limits of Neuroscience-Based Mindreading in the Law?, Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian, eds., 2011).  

Nancey Murphy & Warren S. Brown, Did My Neurons Make Me Do It? Philosophical and Neurobiological Perspectives on Moral Resonsibility and Free Will, Oxford Univ. Press  (2007).  

Richard W. Murphy, Neurocongress, 37 Seton Hall L. Rev. 221  (2006). Abstract

Michael B. Mushlin & Naomi R. Galtz, Getting Real About Race and Prisoner Rights, 36 Fordham Urb. L.J. 27  (2009). Abstract

Julie E. Myers, The Moment of Truth for fMRI: Will Deception Detection Pass Admissibility Hurdles in Oklahoma?, 6 Okla. J. L. & Tech. 47  (2010). Abstract

Thomas Nadelhoffer, The Threat of Shrinking Agency and Free Will Disillusionism, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Thomas Nadelhoffer, Stephanos Bibas, Scott Grafton, Kent A. Kiehl, Andrew Mansfield, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Michael Gazzaniga, Neuroprediction, violence, and the law: setting the stage , Neuroethics 1-33-33  (2010). Abstract

Charles A. Nelson, Incidental Findings in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain Research, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 315  (2008). Abstract

Thomas H. Neuckranz & Bradley C. Nahrstadt, Refuting Diagnostic and Neuropsychological Testing in Toxic Tort Cases, 23 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 19  (1999). Abstract

Elizabeth Nevins-Saunders, Incomprehensible Crimes: Defendants with Mental Retardation Charged with Statutory Rape, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1067  (2010). Abstract

John G. New, If You Could Read My Mind: Implications of Neurological Evidence for Twenty-First Century Criminal Jurisprudence, 29 J. Legal Med. 179  (2008). Abstract

Debra Niehoff, Invisible Scars: The Neurobiological Consequences of Child Abuse, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 847  (2007).  

Donald J. Nolan & Tressa A. Pankovits, High-Tech Proof in Brain Injury Cases, 41-JUN Trial 27  (2005).  

Joel V. Oberstar, Elise M. Anderson & Jonathan B. Jensen, Cognitive and Moral Development, Brain Development, and Mental Illness: Important Considerations for the Juvenile Justice System, 32 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1051  (2006).  

Stephen O'Hanlon, Toward a More Reasonable Approach to Free Will in Criminal Law, 7 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 395  (2009). Abstract

Erin A. O'Hara, How Neuroscience Might Advance the Law, Law and the Brain 21 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

Erin A. O'Hara, Brain Plasticity and Spanish Moss In Biolegal Analysis, 53 Fla. L. Rev. 905  (2001).  

John B. Oldershaw et al., Persistent Vegetative State: Medical, Ethical, Religious, Economic and Legal Perspectives, 1 DePaul J. Health Care L. 495  (1997). Abstract

Timothy P. O'Neill, Mirror Neurons, the New Neuroscience, and the Law: Some Preliminary Observations, 39 Sw. L. Rev. 499  (2010). Abstract

Daniel R. Orme & George Johnstone, Clinical Neuropsychologists: Training, Credentials and Courtroom Credibility, 59 J. Mo. B. 184  (2003).  

Alexis Osburn, Immunizing Against Addiction: The Argument for Incorporating Emerging Anti-Addiction Vaccines into Existing Compulsory Immunization Statutes, 56 Clev. St. L. Rev. 159  (2008).  

Zoe Overbeck, No Match for the Police: An Analysis of Miranda's Problematic Application to Juvenile Defendants, 38 Hastings Const. L.Q. 1053  (2011). Abstract

Elisabeth Pacherie & Patrick Haggard, What are Intentions?, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010). Abstract

Michael S. Pardo, Dennis Patterson, Neuroscience, Normativity, and Retributivism,  (2012). Abstract

Michael S. Pardo, Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience, 2010 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1211  (2010). Abstract

Michael S. Pardo, Dennis Patterson, Minds, Brains, and Norms, 4 Neuroethics __  (2009). Abstract

Michael S. Pardo & Dennis Patterson, Neuroscience Evidence, Legal Culture, and Criminal Procedure, 33 Am. J. Crim. L. 301  (2006). Abstract

Erik Parens, Creativity, Gratitude and the Enhancement Debate: On the Fertile Tension Between Two Ethical Frameworks, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 75 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Purvak Patel et al., The Role of Imaging in United States Courtrooms, 17 Neuroimaging Clinics N. Am. 557  (2007).  

Helen Pearson, Lure of lie detectors spooks ethicists, 441 Nature 918  (2006). Abstract

Steven Penney, Impulse Control and Criminal Responsibility: Lessons from Neuroscience, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry  (2012). Abstract

Joseph M. Peraino, Patrick J. Fitz-Gerald, Psychological considerations in direct filing, 40 MAY Colo. Law. 41  (2011). Abstract

Michael L. Perlin, Considering Pathological Altruism in the Law from Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Neuroscience Perspectives, PATHOLOGICAL ALTRUISM (Oxford Univ. Press, Barbara Oakley et al., ed., 2011) Abstract

Michael L. Perlin, "Good and Bad, I Defined These Terms, Quite Clear No Doubt Somehow": Neuroimaging and Competency to be Executed After Panetti, 28 Behavioral Sciences and the Law 671  (2010). Abstract

Michael L. Perlin, "And I See Through Your Brain": Access to Experts, Competency to Consent, and the Impact of Antipsychotic Medications in Neuroimaging Cases in the Criminal Trial Process, 2009 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 4  (2009). Abstract

Michael L. Perlin, "His Brain Has Been Mismanaged With Great Skill": How Will Jurors Respond to Neuroimaging Testimony in Insanity Defense Cases?, 42 Akron L. Rev. 885  (2009). Abstract

Michael L. Perlin & Valerie R. McClain, Unasked (and Unanswered) Questions About the Role of Neuroimaging in the Criminal Trial Process, 28 Am. J. Forensic Psychol.  (2009). Abstract

Mark Pettit, Jr., fMRI and BF Meet FRE: Brain Imaging and the Federal Rules of Evidence, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 319  (2007). Abstract

Donald W. Pfaff, Possible Neural Mechanisms Underlying Ethical Behaviour, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Martyn Pickersgill, Connecting Neuroscience and Law: Anticipatory Discourse and the Role of Sociotechnical Imaginaries, 30 New Genetics & Soc. 27  (2011). Abstract

Pietro Pietrini & Valentina Bambini, Homo Ferox: The Contribution of Functional Brain Studies to Understanding the Neural Bases of Aggressive and Criminal Behavior, 32 Int'l J.L. & Psychiatry 259  (2009).  

William T. Pizzi, The Need to Overrule Mapp v. Ohio, 82 U. Colo. L. Rev. 679  (2011). Abstract

Susan Pockett & Suzanne Purdy, Are Voluntary Movements Initiated Preconsciously? The Relationships Between Readiness Potentials, Urges, and Decisions, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Susan Pockett, The Concept of Free Will: Philosophy, Neuroscience and the Law, 25 Behav. Sci. & L. 281  (2007). Abstract

Anneliese A. Pontius, Neuro-Image and Crime Kindled Nonconvulsive Behavioral Seizures in 24th Case of "Limbic Psychotic Trigger Reaction" with Bizarre Infanticide by Parent: Is His Nonvoluntariness Testable by LPTR's Primate Model?, Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Hans Markowitsch, ed., 2009).  

Henrique Moraes Prata, Marcia Arajuo Sabino de Freitas, Brainzil Imaging: Challenges for the Largest Latin American Country, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Mark L. Prohaska & David P. Martin, Obtaining Neuropsychological Test Data: Why Is This So Hard?, 68 Ala. Law. 216  (2007).  

Louis J. Ptacek, What Is Neurogenetics?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 26 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

Erin B. Pulice, The Right to Silence at Risk: Neuroscience-based Lie Detection in the United Kingdom, India, and the United States, 42 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 865  (2010). Abstract

Jedediah S. Purdy, The Promise (and Limits) of Neuroeconomics, 58 Ala. L. Rev. 1  (2006). Abstract

Amanda C. Pustilnik, Pain as Fact and Heuristic: How Pain Neuroimaging Illuminates Moral Dimensions of Law, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 4, 2012  (2012). Abstract

Amanda C. Pustilnik, Violence on the Brain: A Critique of Neuroscience in Criminal Law, 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 183  (2009). Abstract

Jeffrey J. Rachlinski & Cynthia R. Farina, Cognitive Psychology and Optimal Government Design, 87 Cornell L. Rev. 549  (2002). Abstract

Eric Racine, Sarah Waldman, Jarett Rosenberg, Judy Illes, "Contemporary neuroscience in the media", 41 Soc. Sci. Med. 725  (2010). Abstract

Eric Racine, Judy Illes, Emerging ethical challenges in advanced neuroimaging research: review, recommendations and research agenda, 2 J. Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1  (2007). Abstract

Eric Racine, Ofek Bar-Ilan & Judy Illes, fMRI In the Public Eye, 6 Nature 159  (2006). Abstract

Eric Racine, Ofek Bar-Ilan, Judy Illes, Brain imaging: a decade of coverage in the print media, 28 Sci. Commun. 122  (2006). Abstract

Jelena Radulovic & Bratislav Stankovic, Genetic Determinants of Emotional Behavior: Legal Lessons from Genetic Models, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 823  (2007). Abstract

Marcus Raichle, What is an fMRI?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 5 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

Jed Rakoff, Lie Detection in the Courts: The Vain Search for the Magic Bullet, Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 40 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).  

Jed S. Rakoff, Science and the Law: Uncomfortable Bedfellows, 38 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1379  (2008).  

Natalie Ram, Tiered Consent and the Tyranny of Choice, 48 Jurimetrics 253  (2008). Abstract

Geoffrey Rapp, The Wreckage of Recklessness, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 111  (2008). Abstract

Emily Ray, Waiver, Certification, and Transfer of Juveniles to Adult Court: Limiting Juvenile Transfers in Texas, 13 SCHOLAR 317  (2010). Abstract

Richard E. Redding, The Brain-Disordered Defendant: Neuroscience and Legal Insanity in the Twenty-First Century, 56 Am. U. L. Rev. 51  (2006). Abstract

Brian Reese, Comment: Using fMRI as a Lie Detector - Are We Lying to Ourselves?, 19 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 205  (2009).  

Donald Reeves, Mark J. Mills, Stephen Billick & Jonathan D. Brodie, Limitations of Brain Imaging in Forensic Psychiatry, 31 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 89  (2003). Abstract

Laura Reider, Toward a New Test for the Insanity Defense: Incorporating the Discoveries of Neuroscience into Moral and Legal Theories, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 289  (1998).  

A.A. T. Simone Reinders, Neuroimage and Crime: Cross-examining Dissociative Identity Disorder: Neuroimaging and Tiology on Trial, Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Hans Markowitsch, ed., 2009).  

Norman Relkin et al., Impulsive Homicide Associated with an Arachnoid Cyst and Unilateral Frontotempo-ral Cerebral Dysfunction, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 172  (1996).  

Richard M. Restak, Brain Damage and Legal Responsibility, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 170  (1996).  

L. Song Richardson, Arrest Efficiency and the Fourth Amendment, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 2035  (2011). Abstract

Lindsey Richland, Ethnography and Cognitive Psychology: Shared Dilemmas of the Local and Unlocatable, 31 PoLAR: Pol. & Legal Anthropology Rev. 48  (2008). Abstract

Tracy Rightmer, Arrested Development: Juveniles' Immature Brains Make Them Less Culpable Than Adults, 9 Quinnipiac Health L.J. 1  (2005).  

Davide Rigoni et al., How neuroscience and behavioral genetics improve psychiatric assessment: report on a violent murder case, 4 Frontiers In Behavioral Neuroscience 1  (2010). Abstract

Michael D. Risinger, Michael J. Saks, William C. Thompson & Robert Rosenthal, Three Card Monte, Monty Hall, Modus Operandi and “Offender Profiling”: Some Lessons of Modern Cognitive Science for the Law of Evidence, 24 Cardozo L. Rev. 193  (2002). Abstract

Michael Risinger & Jeffrey L. Loop, The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 1  (2002). Abstract

Jesse Rissman, Henry T. Greely & Anthony D. Wagner, Detecting Individual Memories Through the Neural Decoding of Memory States and Past Experience, 107 PNAS 9849  (2010). Abstract

Alexandra J. Roberts, Everything New is Old Again: Brain Fingerprinting and Evidentiary Analogy, 9 Yale J.L. & Tech. 234  (2007). Abstract

John A. Robertson, Law, Science, and Innovation: Introduction to the Symposium, 38 J.L. Med. & Ethics 175  (2010).  

Diana Robertson, John Snarey, Opal Ousley, Keith Harenski, F. Dubois Bowman, Rick Gilkey, Clington Kilts, The neural processing or moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care, 45 Neuropsychologia, No. 8, at 755  (2007). Abstract

Paul H. Robinson, Owen D. Jones & Robert Kurzban , Realism, Punishment, and Reform, 77 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1611  (2010). Abstract

Robert Robinson, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals and the Local Construction of Reliability, 19 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 39  (2009). Abstract

Paul H. Robinson, Robert O. Kurzban & Owen D. Jones, The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice, 60 Vand. L. Rev. 1633  (2007). Abstract

Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1  (2007). Abstract

Caroline Rodiger, The Obtainment and Use of Neuroscientific Knowledge in France, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Caroline Rodiger, The Council of Europe's Next "Additional Protocol on Neuroscientific Research"?, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Anna Ronkainen , Dual-Process Cognition and Legal Reasoning, ARGUMENTATION 2011: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF ARGUMENTATION IN LAW (Masaryk University, Micha? Araszkiewicz et al, eds, 2011) Abstract

Jason G. Roof, Modern Brain Imaging Techniques in the Legal System: Is the Lesion the Reason?, 33 CDAA Prosecutor’s Brief 12  (2011).  

Steven B. Roosa, The Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence in Light of In re Bilski, 21 No. 3 Intell. Prop. & Tech. L.J. 6  (2009). Abstract

Adina Roskies, How Does Neuroscience Affect Our Concept of Volition, 33 Ann. Rev. Neurosciences 109  (2010).  

Adina L. Roskies & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Brain Images as Evidence in the Criminal Law, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Adina L. Roskies, Why Libet's Studies Don't Pose a Threat to Free Will, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Adina Roskies, How Is Neuroscience Likely to Impact the Law in the Long Run?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 66 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

Adina Roskies, Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance, 1 Neuroethics 1874  (2008). Abstract

Adina Roskies, A Case Study in Neuroethics: The Nature of Moral Judgment, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 17 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Adina Roskies, Neuroethics for the New Millenium, 35 Neuron 21  (2002).  

Catherine J. Ross, A Stable Paradigm: Revisiting Capacity, Vulnerability and the Rights Claims of Adolescents after Roper v. Simmons, Law, Mind and Brain 183 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009).  

Karen Rothenberg and Alice Wang, The Scarlet Gene: Behavioral Genetics, Criminal Law, and Racial and Ethnic Stigma, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 343  (2006).  

Mark A. Rothstein, Applications of Behavioural Genetics: Outpacing the Science?, 6 Nature Reviews 793  (2005). Abstract

Jason M. Royal & Braley S. Peterson, The Risks and Benefits of Searching for Incidental Findings in MRI Research Scans, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 305  (2008). Abstract

Jane Rutherford, Juvenile Justice Caught Between the Exorcist and a Clockwork Orange, 51 DePaul L. Rev. 715  (2002).  

Eileen P. Ryan, What Psychiatry, Developmental Psychology, and Neuroscience Can Teach Us About At-Risk Students, 17 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 59  (2010).  

Deana Pollard Sacks, Children's Developmental Vulnerability & the Roberts Court's Child-Protective Jurisprudence: An Emerging Trend?, 40 Stetson L. Rev. 777  (2011). Abstract

Deana Pollard Sacks Et Al, Do Violent Video Games Harm Children? Comparing the Scientific Amicus Curiae "Experts" in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 106 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 1  (2011). Abstract

Jessica M. Salerno & Bette L. Bottoms, Emotional Evidence and Jurors' Judgments: the Promise of Neuroscience for Informing Psychology and Law, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 273  (2009).  

Rommel Salvador, Robert G. Folger, Business ethics and the brain, 19 Business Ethics Quarterly 1  (2009). Abstract

Rena M. Samole, Real Employees: Cognitive Psychology and the Adjudication of Non-Competition Agreements, 4 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 289  (2000). Abstract

Chris W. Sanchirico, What Makes the Engine Go? Cognitive Limitations and Cross-Examination, 14 Widener L. Rev. 507  (2009).  

Chris W. Sanchirico, Evidence, Procedure, and the Upside of Cognitive Error, 57 Stan. L. Rev. 291  (2004). Abstract

Anders Sandberg, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Julian Savulescu, Cognitive Enhancement in Courts, Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian, eds., 2011).  

Alan G. Sanfey, George Loewenstain, Samuel M. McClure, Jonathan D. Cohen, Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making, 10 Trends in Cognitive Sciences, No. 3, at 108  (2006). Abstract

Amedeo Santosuosso, Neuroscience and Converging Technologies in Italy: From Free Will Approach to Humans as Not Disconnected Entities, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Robert M. Sapolsky, The Frontal Cortex and the Criminal Justice System, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1787  (2004). Abstract

Thomas P. Sartwelle, Defending a Neurologic Birth Injury: Asphyxia Neonatorum Redux, 30 J. Legal Med. 181  (2009). Abstract

Peggy Sasso, Criminal Responsibility in the Age of "Mind-Reading", 46 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1191  (2009). Abstract

Peggy Sasso, Implementing the Death Penalty: The Moral Implications of Recent Advances in Neuropsychology, 29 Cardozo L. Rev. 765  (2007). Abstract

Kevin W. Saunders, A Disconnect Between Law and Neuroscience: Modern Brain Science, Media Influences, and Juvenile Justice, 2005 Utah L. Rev. 695  (2005). Abstract

Jennifer W. Scangos, Instinct and Rationality: An Evolutionary Approach to Intellectual Property Law, 15 Intell. Prop. L. Bull. 65  (2010). Abstract

Daniel L. Schacter, Jerome Kagan & Michelle D. Leichtman, True and False Memories in Children and Adults: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, 1 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 411  (1995). Abstract

Barry R. Schaller, Using Neuroscience in Criminal Law, Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference 2009: Law, Behavior & the Brain  (2009). Abstract

Frederick Schauer, Can Bad Science Be Good Evidence? Lie Detection, Neuroscience and the Mistaken Conflation of Legal and Scientific Norms, 95 Cornell L. Rev. 1191  (2010).  

Frederick Schauer, Neuroscience, Lie-Detection, and the Law, 14 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 101  (2009). Abstract

Stephan Schleim, Tade M. Spranger, Susanne Erk & Henrik Walter, From Moral to Legal Judgment: The Influence of Normative Context in Lawyers and Other Academics, 6 Social, Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience 48  (2010). Abstract

Susan R. Schmeiser, The Ungovernable Citizen: Psychopathy, Sexuality, and the Rise of Medico-Legal Reasoning, 20 Yale J.L. & Human. 163  (2008).  

Allan Schore, Jennifer McIntosh, Family law and the neuroscience of attachment, part 1, 49 Fam. Ct. Rev. 501  (2011). Abstract

Johannes Schultz, Brain imaging: decoding your memories, 20 Current Biology, No. 6 at 269  (2010). Abstract

Nick J. Schweitzer & Michael J. Saks, Neuroimage Evidence and the Insanity Defense, 29 Behav. Sci. & L. 592  (2011). Abstract

N.J. Schweitzer, Michael J. Saks, Emily R. Murphy, Adina L. Roskies, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Lyn M. Gaudet, Neuroimages as evidence in a mens rea defense: no impact, 17 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 357  (2011). Abstract

Rainer J. Schweizer, Severin Bischof, Switzerland: Brain Research and the Law, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Roger Scruton, More than meets the MRI: The philosopher Roger Scruton laments the rise of nonsensical neuroscience, The Sunday Times, July 5, 2009  (2009). Abstract

Julie Seaman, Black Boxes: fMRI Lie Detection and the Role of the Jury, 42 Akron L. Rev. 931  (2009).  

Jessie A. Seiden, The Criminal Brain: Frontal Lobe Dysfunction Evidence in Capital Proceedings, 16 Cap. Def. J. 395  (2004). Abstract

Francis X. Shen, Morris B. Hoffman, Owen D. Jones, Joshua D. Greene & Rene Marois, Sorting Guilty Minds, 86 NYU L. Rev. 1306  (2011). Abstract

Francis X. Shen, Law and Neuroscience: Possibilities For Prosecutors, 33 CDAA Prosecutor’s Brief 17  (2011).  

Francis X. Shen, Owen D. Jones, Brain scans as evidence: truths, proofs, lies, and lessons, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 861  (2011). Abstract

Francis X. Shen, Morris B. Hoffman, Owen D. Jones, Joshua D. Greene & Rene Marois, Sorting Guilty Minds: An Overview, New York University Law Review  (2011).  

Francis X. Shen, Law and Neuroscience Bibliography: Comments On An Emerging Field, 38 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL INFORMATION 352  (2010).  

Robert E. Shepherd, The Relevance of Brain Research to Juvenile Defense, 19-WTR Crim. Just. 51  (2005). Abstract

Kim Sheridan, Elena Zinchenko & Howard Gardner, Neuroethics in Education, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 265 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Richard K. Sherwin, Neal Feigenson & Christina O. Spiesel, Law in the Digital Age: How Visual Communication Technologies are Transforming the Practice, Theory, and Teaching of Law, 12 B.U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 227  (2006). Abstract

Adam B. Shniderman, You Can’t Handle the Truth: Lies, Damn Lies, and the Exclusion of Polygraph Evidence, ___ Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology ___  (2011).  

Daniel Siegel, Jennifer McIntosh, Family law and the neuroscience of attachment, part 2, 49 Fam. Ct. Rev. 513  (2011). Abstract

David M. Siegel, Psychoactive Medication and Your Client: Better Living and (Maybe) Better Law Through Chemistry, 27-DEC Champion 22  (2003). Abstract

Katrina L. Sifferd, Nanotechnology and the Attribution of Responsibility, 5 Nanotechnology L. & Bus. 177  (2008). Abstract

Katrina Sifferd, Neuroethics, Encloypedia of Human Behavior, 2nd Edition, Forthcoming  (). Abstract

J. Arturo Silva, Forensic Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and the Law, 37 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 489  (2009). Abstract

Salla Silvola, Legal Landscape of Neuroscientific Research and Its Applications in Finland, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Dan Simon, Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Look Through the Lens of Cognitive Psychology, 67 Brook. L. Rev. 1097  (2002). Abstract

Joseph R. Simpson, Functional MRI Lie Detection: Too Good to Be True?, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 491  (2008). Abstract

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet, Oxford University Press  (2010). Abstract

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Neural Lie Detection in Courts, Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 35 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).  

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Adina Roskies, Teneille Brown & Emily Murphy, Brain Images as Legal Evidence, 5 Episteme 359  (2008). Abstract

Mark I. Sirkin, Managing Your Brain: Lessons From Neuroscience, 82-SEP N.Y. St. B.J. 38  (2010). Abstract

Loane Skene, Recent Developments in Stem Cell Research: Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues for the Future, 17 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 211  (2010). Abstract

Loane Skene, Dominic Wilkinson, Guy Kahane, & Julian Savulescu, Neuroimaging and the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patients in Vegetative State, 17 Med. L. Rev. 245  (2009). Abstract

Christopher Slobogin & Mark R. Fondacaro, Juvenile Justice: The Fourth Option, 95 Iowa L. Rev. 1  (2009). Abstract

Robin W. Slocum, The Dilemma of the Vengeful Client: A Prescriptive Framework for Cooling the Flames of Anger, 92 Marq. L. Rev. 481  (2009). Abstract

Paul Slovic, Affect, Reason, and Mere Hunches, 4 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 191  (2007).  

David Randolph Smith, Legal Recognition of Neocortical Death, 71 Cornell L. Rev. 850  (1986).  

O. Carter Snead, Memory and punishment, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1195  (2011). Abstract

O. Carter Snead, Neuroimaging and the “Complexity” of Capital Punishment, 82 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1265  (2007). Abstract

Laura B. Snodgrass & Brad Justice, “Death Is Different”: Limits on the Imposition of the Death Penalty to Traumatic Brain Injuries, 26 Dev. Mental Health L. 81  (2007). Abstract

Patricia Soung, Social And Biological Constructions Of Youth: Implications For Juvenile Justice And Racial Equity, 6 Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol’y 428  (2011).  

David A. Sousa, How Brain Science Can Make You a Better Lawyer, ABA Publishing  (2009). Abstract

Barbara A. Spellman, Embodied Rationality, 35 Queen's L.J. 117  (2009). Abstract

Barbara A. Spellman & Simone Schnall, Reflections of a Recovering Lawyer: How Becoming a Cognitive Psychologist--and (In Particular) Studying Analogical and Causal Reasoning-- Changed My Views About the Field of Psychology and Law, 79 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1187  (2004).  

Sean A. Spence & Catherine J. Kaylor-Hughes, Looking for the Truth and Finding Lies: The Prospects for a Nascent Neuroimaging of Deception, Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Hans Markowitsch, ed., 2009).  

Sean A. Spence et al., A Cognitive Neurobiological Account of Deception: Evidence From Functional Neuroimaging, Law and the Brain 169 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

Christina Spiesel, Reflections on Reading: Words and Pictures and Law, Law, Mind and Brain 391 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009). Abstract

Tade Matthias Spranger, International Neurolaw: A Comparative Analysis, Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011  (2011).  

Tade Matthias Spranger, Neurosciences and the Law: An Introduction, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Tade Matthias Spranger, Legal Implications of Neuroscientific Instruments with Special Regard to the German Constitutional Order, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Tade M. Spranger, Legal Implications in Connection with the Generation and Usage of Neuro-Scientific Findings, 6 J. Int'l Biotechnology L. 228  (2009).  

Jeffrey E. Stake, Just (and Efficient?) Compensation for Governmental Expropriations, Law, Mind and Brain 299 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009).  

Jeffrey E. Stake, The Property "Instinct", Law and the Brain 185 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

Edward Stein, The Admissibility of Expert Testimony About Cognitive Science Research on Eyewitness Identification, 2 Law, Probability & Risk 295  (2003). Abstract

Megan S. Steven & Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Trascranial Magnetic Stimulation and the Human Brain: An Ethical Evaluation, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 201 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

Sarah E. Stoller & Paul R. Wolpe, Emerging Neurotechnologies For Lie Detection and The Fifth Amendment, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 359  (2007). Abstract

Aaron M. Stronge, Absolute Truth or Deus Ex Machina? The Legal and Philosophical Ramifications of Guilt-Assessment Technology, 10 J. High Tech. L. 113  (2009). Abstract

Daniel Strueber & Gerhard Roth, Sex, Aggression and Impulse Control: An Integrative Account, Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Hans Markowitsch, ed., 2009). Abstract

Maurice E. Stucke, Money, Is That What I Want?: Competition Policy and the Role of Behavioral Economics, 50 Santa Clara L. Rev. 893  (2010). Abstract

Maurice E. Stucke, Behavioral Economists at the Gate: Antitrust in the Twenty-First Century, 38 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 513  (2007). Abstract

Cass R. Sunstein, Some Effects of Moral Indignation on Law, 33 Vt. L. Rev. 405  (2009). Abstract

Carol M. Suzuki, Unpacking Pandora's Box: Innovating Techniques for Effectively Counseling Asylum Applicants Suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, 4 Hastings Race & Poverty L. J. 235  (2007). Abstract

Rick Swedloff & Peter H. Huang, Tort Damages and the New Science of Happiness, 85 Ind. L.J. 553  (2010). Abstract

Deborah Talmi & Chris D. Frith, Neuroscience, Free Will, and Responsibility, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Laurence R. Tancredi & Jonathan D. Brodie, The Brain and Behavior: Limitations in the Legal Use of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 271  (2007). Abstract

Laurence Tancredi, Neuroscience Developments and the Law, Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 71 (Dana Foundation, Brent Garland, ed., 2004).  

Andrew E. Taslitz, Police Are People Too: Cognitive Obstacles To, and Opportunities For, Police Getting the Individualized Suspicion Judgment Right, 8 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 7  (2010).  

Erich Taylor, A New Wave of Police Interrogation? “Brain Fingerprinting,” the Constitutional Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, and Hearsay Jurisprudence, 2006 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol'y 287  (2006). Abstract

Janice Tazbir, The Human Genome Project: Ethical and Legal Considerations for Neuroscience Nurses, 33 J Neurosci Nurs. 180  (2001). Abstract

Adam Teitcher, Weaving Functional Brain Imaging into the Tapestry of Evidence: A Case for Functional Neuroimaging in Federal Criminal Courts, 80 Fordham Law Review 355  (2011). Abstract

D. Terracina, Neuroscience and Penal Law: Ineffectiveness of the Penal Systems and Flawed Perception of the Underevaluation of Behaviour Constituting Crime, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Pauline H. Tesler, Goodbye Homo Economicus: Cognitive Dissonance, Brain Science, and Highly Effective Collaborative Practice, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 635  (2009).  

Anthony C. Thompson, Clemency for our children, 32 Cardozo L. Rev. 2641  (2011). Abstract

Robert B. Thompson, Brave New World of Interrogation Jurisprudence?, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 341  (2007).  

Sean K. Thompson, My Brain Made Me Do It, 2006-FEB Legal Aff. 50  (2006). Abstract

Nicholas Thompson, The Legality of the Use of Psychiatric Neuroimaging in Intelligence Interrogation, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 1601  (2005). Abstract

Sean K. Thompson, Securities Regulation in an Electronic Age: The Impact of Cognitive Psychology, 75 Wash. U. L.Q. 779  (1997). Abstract

Thomas Tomlinson, Pattern-based memory and the writing used to refresh, 73 Tex. L. Rev. 1461  (1995). Abstract

Michael J. Tonsing, Truth Detection via Polygraphs and fMRIs, 55-AUG Fed. Law. 10  (2008).  

Ciara Toole, Amy Zarzeczny, Timothy Caulfield, Research Ethics Challenges in Neuroimaging Research: A Canadian Perspective, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Andrew W. Torrance, Neurobiology and Patenting Thought, 50 IDEA 27  (2009). Abstract

Stacey A. Tovino, Women's Neuroethics, Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian, eds., 2011).  

Stacey A. Tovino, Scientific Understandings of Postpartum Illness: Improving Health Law and Policy?, 33 Harv. J. L. & Gender 99  (2010).  

Stacey A. Tovino, Neuroscience and Health Law: An Integrative Approach, 42 Akron L. Rev. 469  (2009).  

Stacey A. Tovino, Remarks: Neuroscience, Gender, and the Law, 42 Akron L. Rev. 941  (2009).  

Stacey A. Tovino, Neuroimaging Research into Disorders of Consciousness: Moral Imperative or Ethical and Legal Failure?, 13 Va. J.L. & Tech. 2  (2008). Abstract

Stacey A. Tovino, The Impact of Neuroscience on Health Law, 1 Neuroethics 73  (2008).  

Stacey A. Tovino, Imaging Body Structure and Mapping Brain Function: A Historical Approach, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 193  (2007). Abstract

Stacey A. Tovino, Functional Neuroimaging Information: A Case for Neuro Exceptionalism?, 34 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 415  (2007).  

Stacey A. Tovino, Functional Neuroimaging and the Law: Trends and Directions for Future Scholarship, 7 Am. J. of Bioethics 44  (2007). Abstract

Stacey A. Tovino & William J. Winslade, A Primer on the Law and Ethics of Treatment, Research, and Public Policy in the Context of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, 14 Annals Health L. 1  (2005). Abstract

Stacey A. Tovino, The Confidentiality and Privacy Implications of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 33 J.L. Med. & Ethics 844  (2005). Abstract

Michael T. Treadway, Joshua W. Buckholtz, On the Use and Misuse of Genomic and Neuroimaging Science in Forensic Psychiatry: Current Roles and Future Directions, Forensic Psychiatry (Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, William Bernet, MD and Bradley W. Freeman, MD, Eds., July 2011, Volume 20, Number 3)  

Surya M. Tripathi, Advances in Neuroscience and Evidentiary Value of Brain Mapping: A Legal Debate, 29 Indian J. Criminology & Criminalistics 1  (2008). Abstract

Robert D. Truog, Brain Death -- Too Flawed to Endure, too Ingrained to Abandon, 35 J.L. Med. & Ethics 273  (2007). Abstract

Rebecca Tushnet, Gone In Sixty Milliseconds: Trademark Law and Cognitive Science, 86 Tex. L. Rev. 507  (2008). Abstract

William R. Uttal, Neuroscience in the Courtroom: What Every Lawyer Should Know about the Mind and the Brain, Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company  (2008). Abstract

Lea B. Vaughn, Feeling at Home: Law, Cognitive Science, and Narrative, ___ McGeorge Law Review ___  (2011). Abstract

Jeff Victoroff, Aggression, Science and Law: The Origins Framework, 32 Int'l J. L. & Psychiatry 189  (2009). Abstract

Takis Vidalis, Georgia-Martha Gkotsi, Neurolaw in Greece: An Overview, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

A.M. Viens, Reciprocity and Neuroscience in Public Health Law, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Nicole A. Vincent, Legal responsibility adjudication and the normative authority of the mind sciences, 14 Philosophical Explorations 3  (2011). Abstract

Nicole A. Vincent, Capacitarianism, responsibility and restored mental capacities, Wolf Legal Publishers Abstract

Nicole A. Vincent, The challenges posted to private law by emerging cognitive enhancement technologies, The Law of the Future and the Future of the Law, pp. 511-521 N. A. Vincent, S. Muller, S. Zouridis, M. Frishman, L. Kistemaker, eds., Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, Oslo, 2011  (2011). Abstract

Nicole Vincent, Madness, Badness and Neuro-imaging-based Responsibility Assessments, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Nicole A Vincent, Pim Haselager, Gert-Jan Lokhorst, "The Neuroscience of Responsibility" - Workshop Report, 4 Neuroethics 175  (2010). Abstract

Nicole A. Vincent, Neuroimaging and Responsibility Assessments, 1 Neuroethics 35  (2009). Abstract

Nicole A. Vincent, On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility, 4 Crim. L. & Philosophy 77  (2009). Abstract

Nicole A. Vincent, Responsibility, Dysfuncton and Capacity, 1 Neuroethics 199  (2008). Abstract

Florian Wagner-von Papp, Self-Exclusion Agreements: Should We Be Free not to Be Free to Ruin Ourselves? Gambling, Self-Exclusion Agreements and the Brain, Law, Mind and Brain 81 (Ashgate, Michael Freeman & Oliver R. Goodenough, eds., 2009).  

Aldert Vrij et al., Increasing Cognitive Load to Facilitate Lie Detection: The Benefit of Recalling an Event in Reverse Order, 32 Law & Hum. Behav. 253  (2008). Abstract

Anthony Wagner, Can Neuroscience Identify Lies?, A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 13 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).  

Jacob R. Waldbauer & Michael S. Gazzaniga, The Divergence of Neuroscience and Law, 41 Jurimetrics J. 357  (2001). Abstract

Ellen A. Waldman, Mindfulness, Emotions, and Ethics: The Right Stuff?, 10 Nev. L.J. 513  (2010). Abstract

Charlotte Walsh, Youth Justice And Neuroscience: A Dual-Use Dilemma, 55 Brit. J. Criminology 21  (2011). Abstract

Lynn D. Wardle, The Biological Causes and Consequences of Homosexual Behavior and Their Relevance for Family Law Policies, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 997  (2007).  

Henning Wegmann, Summary: Neurolaw in an International Comparison, International Neurolaw (Springer, Tade Spranger, Ed., 2011)  

Janet Weinstein & Ricardo Weinstein, “I Know Better Than That”: The Role of Emotions and the Brain in Family Law Disputes, 7 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 351  (2005).  

Janet Weinstein & Ricardo Weinstein, Before It's Too Late: Neuropsychological Consequences of Child Neglect and Their Implications for Law and Social Policy, 33 U. Mich. J.L. Ref. 561  (2000). Abstract

Deena S. Weisberg et al., The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations, 20 J. Cognitive Neuroscience 470  (2008). Abstract

Zachary Weiss, The Legal Admissibility of Positron Emission Tomography Scans in Criminal Cases: People v. Spyder Cystkopf, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 202  (1996).  

Daniel Weitz, The brains behind mediation: reflections on neuroscience, conflict resolution and decision-making, 12 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 471  (2011). Abstract

Gary L. Wells, Field Experiments on Eyewitness Identification: Towards a Better Understanding of Pitfalls and Prospects, 32 Law & Hum. Behav. 6  (2008). Abstract

Thalia Wheatley & Christine Looser, Prospective Codes Fulfilled: A Potential Neural Mechanism of the Will, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Jeremy Britton Whitbeck, Taming the beast: cognitive enhancement, ethical implications, and regulating today for tomorrow's scientific and technological advancements in neuroscience,  (2011). Abstract

Stephen E. White, Brave New World: Neurowarfare and the Limits of International Humanitarian Law, 41 Cornell Int'l L.J. 177  (2008). Abstract

Dominic Wilkinson & Charles Foster, The Carmentis Machine: Legal and Ethical Issues in the Use of Neuroimaging to Guide Treatment Withdrawal in Newborn Infants, Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Michael Freeman, ed., 2010).  

Susan M. Wolf, Incidental Findings in Neuroscience Research: A Fundamental Challenge to the Structure of Bioethics and Health Law, Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian, eds., 2011).  

Susan M. Wolf, Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 219  (2008). Abstract

Susan M. Wolf et al., The Challenge of Incidental Findings, 36 J. L. Med. & Ethics 216  (2008).  

Susan Wolf, Neurolaw: The Big Question, 8 Am. J. Bioethics 21  (2008).  

Paul R. Wolpe, Is My Mind Mine? Neuroethics and Brain Imaging, The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics (Arthur L. Caplan, Autumn Fiester, & Vardit Ravitsky eds., 2009)  

Paul R. Wolpe, Religious Responses to Neuroscientific Questions, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 289 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

William A. Woodruff, Functional magnetic resonance imaging to detect deception: not ready for the courtroom,  (2010). Abstract

Kurt W. Worley, "Just Look at the Picture…There's No Way He Formed Intent" Brain Scans Used as Visual Aids, 33 CDAA Prosecutor’s Brief 28  (2011).  

Hal S. Wortzel & David B. Arciniegas, Amnesia and Crime: A Neuropsychiatric Response, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 218  (2008). Abstract

Hal S. Wortzel, Christopher M. Filley, C. Alan Anderson, Timothy Oster, David B. Arciniegas, Forensic applications of cerebral single photon emission computed tomography in mild traumatic brain injury, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 310  (2008). Abstract

G. Christopher Wright, Taxation of Personal Injury Awards: Addressing the Mind/Body Dualism that Plagues § 104(A)(2) of the Tax Code, 60 Cath. U. L. Rev. 211  (2010). Abstract

Beth Ann Wright, Preserving the Social Contract: Translating Academic Education into Professional Practice Through Contemporary Cognitive Theories, 11 T.M. Cooley J. Prac. & Clinical L. 17  (2008).  

Gideon Yaffe, Lowering the Bar for Addicts, Addiction and Responsibility (edited by George Graham and Jeffrey Poland, MIT Press)  

Gideon Yaffe, Libet and the Criminal Law's Voluntary Act Requirement, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel, eds., 2010).  

Gideon Yaffe, Recent Work on Addiction and Responsible Agency, Philosophy & Public Affairs 30, no. 2 (Princeton University Press)  

Gideon Yaffe, Intoxication, Recklessness and Negligence, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law  ().  

Gideon Yaffe, Are Addicts Akratic?: Interpreting the Neuroscience of Reward, Addiction and Self-Control (edited by Neil Levy, Oxford University Press)  

Yaling Yang, Andrea L. Glenn & Adrian Raine, Brain Abnormalities in Antisocial Individuals: Implications for the Law, 26 Behav. Sci. & L. 65  (2008). Abstract

Jeffrey E. Young, Bilski and the Transformation of the Brain, 2 No. 2 Landslide 46  (2009). Abstract

Paul J. Zak, Neuroeconomics, Law and the Brain 133 (Oxford Univ. Press, Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., 2006). Abstract

Amy Zarzeczny & Timothy Caulfield, Public Representations of Neurogenetics, Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian, eds., 2011).  

Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough, eds., Law and the Brain, Oxford University Press  (2006). Abstract

Adam S. Zimmerman, Funding Irrationality, 59 Duke L.J. 1105  (2010). Abstract

Laurie Zoloth, Being in the World, Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 61 (Oxford Univ. Press, Judy Illes, ed., 2005).  

No Author, A symposium of the mercer law review, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 769  (2010). Abstract

No Author, Neuroethics needed: researchers should speak out on claims made on behalf of their science, 441 Nature, No. 7096  (2006). Abstract